Advanced concept and perspectives toward MXenes based energy storage device: Comprehensive review
ENDNOTE, MENDELEY , DOWNLOAD PDF
DIO: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2024.102089
Kefayat Ullah1,
Noor Alam1, Salah Uddin1 and Won-Chun Oh2*
1Department
of Applied Physical and Material sciences, University of swat, 19120, KPK,
Pakistan
2Department
of Advanced Materials Science & Engineering, Hanseo University, Seosan-si,
Chungnam 31962, Republic of Korea
Abstract:
The
hunt for the suitable material to be used as electrode material for Li Ion
batteries has increased over the past decades. The emerging of MXenes has been
used significantly in the field of batteries. MXenes has been considered as the
most suitable 2D materials for battery technologies due to its desirable
properties. The production of MXenes has been found to be cheap and scalable as
compared to other counterparts such graphene and 2D transition metal
chalcogenides. MXenes can be used as electrodes in these batteries owing to its
desirable properties such as, outstanding conductivity, hydrophilicity options
to intercalate various elements, surface functionalities and various possible
structural combinations. Here in we highlighted various compositions as
anode/cathode materials and other battery components based MXenes.
Specifically, the use of MXenes as host materials for ions as a separator
modifier and conductive preservative has been discussed. Also, MXene-based
nanostructures are introduced and discussed, focusing on their preparation
methods, properties, and applications for energy storage devices.
Keywords: LIBs;
MXenes; Anodes; Separator; 2D
1. Introduction
Besides graphene, the
quickly growing two-dimensional materials have received a lot of interest
because of their unique mechanical, electrical, optical, and thermal characteristics
that set them apart from their bulk counterparts [1-3]. Recently, novel family of 2D metal nitride,
carbide, or carbonitrides layered materials, labeled as MXenes, including MO2C,
Ti3C2,
Ti2N,
Ti3CN,
Ti2C,
Nb4C3,
and so forth, have captured the interest of researchers [4, 5]. MXenes has been identified
as a promising new contender that attracts strong interest in energy storage [6, 7], electronics [8, 9], sensors [10, 11], and cancer
treatment [12, 13] because of its
enormous specific surface area, hydrophilicity, numerous terminal groups, and
high electrical conductivity [14].
MXenes are generally denoted by their chemical formula
Mn+1XnTx,
synthesis approach for etching A-layers selectively from 3D crystalline layered
carbides and nitrides, mainly MAX phases (Mn+1AXn)
or another layered ceramic precursor involves methods from both the bottom up
and the top down [15] resultant multilayer particles are
then delaminated into individual MXene sheets or flakes [16] where T is a
surface terminal, such as OH, O, or F; n = 1, 2, or 3; M is an early
transition metal; X is carbon or nitrogen, or their combination; and A is an
element of group 13 or 14 [17]. Over the years
there has been an increasing fascination, with MXenes as electrodes in energy
storage applications such, as supercapacitors and batteries [18]. The core layer
made of metal transition and the surface resembling transition metal oxide, in MXenes
create pathways for electron movement which offer numerous sites for chemical
reactions [19]. These two
advantages working together enable MXenes to achieve charge storage making them
suitable, for high speed applications [20, 21]. Additionally by
modifying the surface terminations MXenes can be adapted to chemical reactions
resulting in increased capacity and added functionality [22, 23]. According to
theoretical simulations and calculations, ,
,
,
,
, and other ions can
quickly migrate inside MXenes. It's interesting to mention that when metal ions
are intercalated extensively, they can create a layer that leads to an
increase, in capacity. On the other hand storage performance is significantly
affected by the termination groups, on the surface [24]. The reduced ion
diffusion barriers assist in improving the ion batteries' rate performance [25, 26]. Therefore, Metal-oxygen,
metal-sulfur, and metal-ion batteries are just a few of the battery systems
that have made considerable use of MXenes. MXenes are utilized as coatings, for
metal anodes to inhibit dendrite formation [27, 28]. Ever since
lithium ion batteries (LIBs) were successfully introduced by SONY to the market
in 1991 they have become the choice, for energy storage systems over the few
decades [29]. The increasing
demand, for high power density and high capacity in Lithium ion batteries
(LIBs) is driven by the rapid growth of electric vehicles and portable
electronic devices, in today’s industrial landscape. [30]. The large
accessible surface areas provided by 2D nanomaterials translate to
significantly more electrochemically available sites to attract Li-ions [31]. Thus, by
utilizing the 2D electrodes a higher capacity can be achieved. 2D
carbonitrides, carbides, and nitrides of transition metals (MXenes) are
promising materials to be employed as rechargeable battery electrodes [32] due to their outstanding
stability [33, 34] large surface
area [35] high
electrical/thermal conductivity [36] excellent
oxidation resistance [37]. MXenes show extraordinary
conductivity (e.g., ≈3250 ± 100 S
for V2CTx,
≈9880 S
for
Ti3C2Tx) [38] and greater hydrophilicity
(contact angle is ≈21.5°–35°) [39] ensuring aqueous
electrolyte wettability and chemical stability [40, 41].
Two-dimensional materials are introduced
through various methods, such as etching layers of 3D crystalline materials or
delaminating multilayer particles. These two-dimensional materials possess
unique mechanical, electrical, optical, and thermal characteristics that
distinguish them from their bulk counterparts. Actually, single, multi-layer,
or few-layer 2D MXene nanosheets have poor stability in oxygen environment,
strong hydrogen bonds and van der Waals interactions between adjacent
nanosheets severely restrict further development of pristine MXenes by causing
them to collapse and stack, reducing their specific surface area and hampering the
electrolyte's penetration and diffusion, which reduces electrochemical
performance [42]. Inspired by the graphene's
elemental doping process, which has gained popularity in recent years, [43] enhancing
pristine MXene's electronic, magnetic, optical, and other properties by
elemental doping (MXene composites) techniques has been shown to be a workable
strategy [44]. Element doping
offers advantages, including the transformation of sites, improving the
materials conductivity and converting them into electrochemically active
components [45] doping a material
to introduce flaws and alter its magnetic characteristics in order to modify
its electronic structure[46] causing an
effective induction of Fermi energy [47] Changing the
chemical bonds or functional groups that promote polysulfide transitions and
prevent MXene rearrangement [48] Modifying a
material's bandgap and surface chemical characteristics to increase catalytic
performance [49,
50]. Also, Introducing
spacers between the layers of MXenes has been discovered to be a successful
method for improving the electrochemical performance of MXenes to develop a
porous structure [51]. The introduction
of conductive polymers, nano-carbon, metal oxides, heteroatoms, and TMDs significantly
increased the interlayer distance to achieve improved electrochemical
performance [52, 53]. Also, a growing
number of researchers are focusing on finding ecologically friendly ways to
investigate novel MXenes that are fluoride-free [54]. However the high
costs of lithium caused by its availability, in nature (for example 0.002%
found in the earth’s crust) make it less economically viable for widespread
use, on a grid scale level [55]. Consequently, a
plethora of innovative rechargeable battery systems, commonly referred to as
"beyond-lithium batteries," have been investigated and are
demonstrating significant advancement, that depend on elements that are more
plentiful, such as aluminum (8.2%), magnesium (2.3%), sodium (2.3%), potassium
(2.1%), and zinc (0.0075%) [56]. Importantly,
because they are all members of the IA element group and have similar chemical
characteristics with lithium, sodium and potassium have garnered increased
interest for application in next-generation batteries [57, 58]. Scheme 1 shows a
conceptual diagram of a simple MXene-based lithium secondary battery.
Scheme 1.
Simple secondary battery concept with MXene.
2. An Overview of MXene
In 2011, By soaking Ti3AlC2
particles at room temperature in hydrofluoric acid (HF), it was shown that the
Al layers in a Ti3AlC2
MAX phase could be selectively etched. This finding was made while trying to
figure out how to enable the insertion of lithium ions in layered ternary
transition-metal carbide/nitride phases or MAX phases [59, 60]. The bulk
three-dimensional (3D) crystalline Ti3AlC2
MAX phase particles underwent this selective etching treatment, which resulted
in two-dimensional (2D) sheets of Ti3C2 layers
(MXene), where from the etching medium Ti atoms on the surface are terminated
by surface groups, such as –F, –OH, and, –O which in the Ti3C2Tx
formula are denoted by T [61]. As yet, MAX
phases have been converted to the majority of MXenes by delicately etching the
Al layers [62]. Layers of an A
element bind with layers of Mn+1Xn
in ternary nitrides and carbides to form MAX phases [63]. As shown in figure
1(a) M is a transition metal (such as Cr, Zr, Ti, Mo, etc), n value is from
1 to 3. Groups 13–16 of the periodic table, which include Si, Al, Ge, Ga, and
so on, are the A elements [64] and X can be
either nitrogen, carbon, or a
combination of the two.
Some of the most lately research
has demonstrated that transition metals from groups 8–12 (Ir, Au, Fe, Cd, Zn,
Cu.) may also form solid solutions or pure A elements that make up the A layer
of MAX phases [65]. Ti3C2Tx,
the first discovered and most popular one among various MXenes which has demonstrated
outstanding advantages due to its low open-circuit voltage, low Li-ion
diffusion barrier, and large theoretical Li storage capacity [66, 67]. Without any additives, a Ti3C2Tx
colloidal solution may be readily built into a flexible, self-supporting Ti3C2Tx MXene
paper [68]. Crucially,
flexible Ti3C2Tx MXene
paper has outstanding mechanical flexibility and extremely metallic
conductivity (about 4000–15,000 S ) [69] which makes it a
desirable substitute for metal current collectors [70]. More than 30 MXene
members and Over 150 distinct MAX phases were successfully synthesized
experimentally to far, and hundreds more are expected to be thermodynamically
stable [71]. Though there are
rare exceptions, as was previously shown, the majority of MAX phases are the
source of MXenes. Despite having a comparable crystal structure to the MAX
phase, MO2CTx
is the first MXene to be produced from MO2Ga2C,
a non-MAX phase [72]. It is more
difficult to produce the MO2CTx MXene
because both layers of Ga must be selectively etched off. Subsequently, Zr3C2Tx
and Hf3C2Tx,
two more MXenes, were successfully created from the non-MAX phases as well,
namely Zr3Al3C5 and
Hf3[Al(Si)]4C6,
respectively [73]. As a result, in
contrast to other 2D materials, MXenes constitute a large family of materials
with a wide range of properties such as electromagnetic interference shielding
performance, high electrical conductivity, and volumetric capacitance [74,
75]. Three potential lattice arrangements
for the resultant MXene exist since the value of n for MAX phases
ranges from 1 to 3: M2X, M3X2,
and M4X3 as
shown in above figure 1(b) [76, 77]. The lighter
members of the M2X family of MXenes often have better gravimetric
capacities than the larger formula weight members of M3X2 and
M4X3 [78].
Figure 1(a-b):
a) Periodic table elements that are known to create the Mn+1AXn
phases. b) Analyzed MAX phase structure and related MXenes. Ref [79]. Copyright
2014, Wiley-VCH.
2.1 Synthesis Strategies
The stacking of 2D
transition-metal carbide/nitride layers connected by an "A" element
explains the structure of the MAX phase [80]. The M–X
(covalent/ionic/metallic) bond is comparatively stronger than the M–A (metallic
bond) bond in its molecular structure [81]. Because the M-A and
M-X have differing strengths, the reactivity of the A layers is greater. Thus,
with the right etching reagents (hydrofluoric acid), it should be quite easy to
remove the A layers. MXene's properties are dependent on synthesis and
processing [82]. The properties
of MXenes vary according to the kind of etchant used, its
concentration, the duration of the sonication process, and the type of
solvent [83]. For example, the
capacitance,, and rate performance of free-standing film electrodes,
and electrical conductivity are all impacted by the size of the MXene
flakes [84]. So synthesis
method of MXene has generated extensive interest, and Numerous techniques have
been created, which may be categorized into two primary approaches: both
bottom-up (like chemical vapor deposition (CVD)) and top-down (like etching
from MAX or non-Max precursors) [85]. The synthesis strategy
of the article is etching followed by delamination.
2.2 Etching (Removal of “A” Layers)
Many etchants have been
created to date. The most widely researched etching etchant is hydrofluoric
acid (HF) and the first one to be used to produce MXenes from their equivalent
MAX precursors among the many available etchants. Using 50% HF as the etchant, Naguib
et al. [86] eliminated Al
components from the MAX phase, generating accordion-like Ti3C2,
as shown in figure 2, between each layer, surface groups generate
hydrogen bonds and the van der Waals force [87]. Additional ultrasonic treatment was
used to separate the sheets. The -O, -OH, and -F groups easily functionalized
the surface of Ti3C2 during the etching process,
producing T-terminated Ti3C2Tx
having a hydrophilic nature [88]. The exact
condition of etching is determined by temperature, reaction time, HF
concentration, and the type of MAX phase. For 24 h, 18 h, and 5 h, each gram of
Ti3AlC2 MAX may be etched at room temperature to 40°C by
adding 5, 10, and 30 wt% HF, respectively. [89]. Defining the
etching process might include the following reactions [86]:
Ti3AlC2 +
3HF = AlF3 + H2
+ Ti3C2
Ti3C2
+ 2HF = Ti3 C2
(F)2 + H2
Ti3C2
+ 2H20 = Ti3 C2
(OH)2 +H2
Ti3C2 +
2H20
= Ti3 C2
(0)2 + 2H2
Figure 2: Diagrammatic
representation of the Ti3AlC2 exfoliation process with HF etchant.[90]
2.2.1 Wet Chemical Routes
Even so, the bond between
M-A are naturally less strong than the bonds between M-X in MAX phases even in
2D materials like graphite, they are still much stronger than the van der Waals
force between adjacent layers [91]. Before using HF
for etching, researchers attempted alternative approaches, but they were
unsuccessful. For example, The MAX phases were heated to a high temperature by
Barsoum et al. in molten metals (such as molten Al with Ti3SiC2)
[92] in molten
salts (cryolite) [93] LiF [94] and in vacuum [95]. But again, the
high temperatures disrupted the layered structure. Since these high-temperature
melt methods did not selectively remove just the A layers, 2D MXenes could not
be produced. This led researchers to explore chemical etching methods which
could selectively remove the A layers at lower temperatures and preserve the 2D
structure of MXenes. It should be noted that powerful etchants like Cl2 gas may
damage the 2D MX structure while mild etchants alone cannot fully remove the A
layers. Proper control of etchant type and reaction conditions is needed to
produce high quality MXenes [96]. In addition to the
etchants' chemical activity, the reaction temperature has to be closely
examined. Ti2AlC and HF, for instance, would react at 55°C to produce Ti2AlF9 but not Ti2AlC MXene [97]. In order to
maximize the etching process and generate high-quality MXenes, a detailed
knowledge of the etching processes is necessary [98]. The HF has been used
to produce several MXenes since it has been shown to be an efficient MAX
etchant as shown in table 1 [99].
Table 1: Different MXenes prepared by HF etching.
S. No. |
Origins |
MXene |
|
Conditions |
|
||
|
|
|
Time
(h) |
Yield
(%) |
Ref. |
||
1. |
Ti2AIC |
Ti2CTx |
10 |
80 |
[100] |
||
2 |
Nb4AIC3 |
Nb4C3Tx |
96 |
77 |
[101] |
||
3 |
V4AIC3 |
V4C3Tx |
165 |
NA |
[102] |
||
4 |
Ti3AICN |
Ti3CNTx |
18 |
80 |
[103] |
||
5 |
Mo2TiAlC2 |
Mo2TiC2Tx |
48 |
100 |
[104] |
||
6 |
Mo2Ti2AIC3 |
Mo2Ti2C3Tx |
90 |
100 |
[104] |
||
7 |
(Mo2/3Y1/3)2AIC |
Mo4/3CTx |
6072 |
NA |
[105] |
||
8 |
(Nb2/3Sc1/3)2AlC |
Nb4/3CTx |
30 |
NA |
[106] |
||
9 |
(W2/3Sc1/3)2AlC |
W4/3CTx |
30 |
NA |
[107] |
||
10 |
Zr3AI3C5 |
Zr3C2Tx |
60 |
NA |
[108] |
||
11 |
Hf3[Al (Si)]4C6 |
Hf3C2Tx |
60 |
NA |
[109] |
||
12 |
V2AIC |
V2CTx |
90 |
60 |
[110] |
||
13 |
Nb2AIC |
Nb2CTx |
90 |
100 |
[111] |
||
14 |
Ti2AIN |
Ti2NTx |
24 |
NA |
[112] |
||
15 |
Mo2Ga2C |
MO2CTx |
3 |
NA |
[113] |
||
16 |
(Ti0.5Nb0.5)2AIC |
(Ti0.5Nb0.5)2CTx |
28 |
80 |
[103] |
||
17 |
Ti3AIC2 |
Ti3C2Tx |
2 |
100 |
[114] |
||
18 |
(V0.5Cr0.5)3AIC2 |
(V0.5Cr0.5)3C2Tx |
69 |
NA |
[103] |
||
19 |
Ta4AIC3 |
Ta4C3Tx |
72 |
90 |
[103] |
||
Primarily based on the
MAX particle size and M-A bond strength, the
temperature, concentration, and reaction time differ across
scenarios. Consequently, to produce high-yield, high-quality, and
well-defined MXenes, proper etching conditions are crucial [115, 116].
While
HF is a very poisonous and harmful chemical, it can successfully etch MAX
phases while preserving its two-dimensional nature. Therefore, other
strategies to lessen or even completely minimize the usage of HF have been
investigated. Using combinations of several acids and a modest quantity of HF
would be an easy way to go. For instance, Ti3AlC2
MAX powder was effectively etched by Dirscoll et al. using a 6:3:1
volumetric ratio of HCl, deionized water, and HF [117, 118]. Compared to the approach that uses
HF only, this method significantly decreases the quantity of HF by 90%.
Furthermore, at room temperature (25 °C), It is possible to create MXene
nanosheets with a high lateral dimension and less defects at a high throughput [119]. Ghidiu et al.
devised a milder synthesis approach in 2014 wherein a reaction between HCl
and LiF produced the HF acid in situ (where the molar ratio of Ti3AlC2:
LiF: HCl is 1:0.5:11.7). By using this technique instead of directly using HF,
nanosheets with greater lateral diameters and fewer flaws are produced, in
comparison to HF-etched MXenes [99, 119]. Later, by adding more LiF salt and HCl
acid, the LiF/HCl pathway was improved [120]. The MILD
process, or minimally intensive layer delamination, is the best approach. It's
crucial to remember that the MILD approach, which may yield even bigger MXene
flakes with less defects than the original HCl/ HF procedure, simply requires
manual handshaking and does not need sonication [121]. Figure 3 compares the MILD
approach with the LiF/HCl pathway followed by sonication. Similarly, it was
shown that Ti3AlC2
MAX could be etched under hydrothermal conditions at 180°C without the need of
HF using NaBF4/HCl [122].
Figure 3 (a-e):
a) A diagrammatic overview of Routes 2 (MILD technique) and 1 (HCL+HF
etching followed by sonication). b, c) Ti3C2Tx flakes generated by Route
1 were examined using scanning and transmission electron microscopy (TEM and
SEM). d, e) Ti3C2Tx
flakes made using Route 2 are characterized using TEM and SEM. Reproduced with
permission [98]. Copyright
2021, Wiley-VCH.
In addition to the
fluoride salt/acid combinations, Ti3AlC2
MAX could also be etched by NH4HF2,
a weak acid that is safe for the environment, however it took a lot longer than
HF [123]. Compared to the
HF etched one (19.8 Å), wider interlayer spacing is shown in the resulting Ti3C2Tx MXene
(the c lattice parameter is 24.7 Å). This clearly suggests that TEM and X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies reveal that the cations (NH4+)
and/or NH3 intercalate during the etching process. In addition, NH4F
was only used as an etchant in a hydrothermal process to create Ti3C2Tx MXene
at 150 °C for 24 hours [81]. Furthermore, Mei
et al. produced the fluorine-free mesoporous Mo2C
MXene in the phosphoric acid etching solution by using a UV light-induced
technique [124]. Recent
developments in HF-free approaches for obtaining The field has shown a great
deal of interest in and relevance for MXenes with surface terminations other
than F. These approaches offer safer alternatives to the traditional HF etching
method and open up possibilities for obtaining MXenes with diverse surface
terminations, which can significantly affect their properties and
electrochemical performance [70]. To achieve high
quality MXenes it is crucial to control the etching process and conditions.
Typically, weaker etchants, like LiF/HCl, NH4HF2 and
NH4F
require etching times and/or higher reaction temperatures. When using the
etchant to etch MAX phases it is important to adjust the reaction conditions
accordingly. Factors such as temperature, fluorine ion concentration, and reaction
time reaction, should be modified based on parameters such as, the value of n
and the number of M. Generally, when the atomic number of M increases the
energy of M-A bonds also increases, necessitating times and/or higher
temperatures [125]. More fluorine
ions and a longer reaction time are also needed for a higher value of n [116, 126].
2.2.2 Molten Salt Method
Molten salt [127, 128] and halogen-based [129, 130] etching have
become more popular than wet-chemical etching in aqueous solutions since these
method have generated MXenes with Tx functionalities (-NH, -Cl, -S, -I, -Te,
-Se, -Br) besides what is possible with traditional HF-based etching [23]. Due to their
abundance, water solubility, and thermal stability, the manufacture of
low-cost, high-yield 2D MXene materials is often streamlined by the use of
salts [131]. Following
melting, the molten salts served as solvents, dissolving solid reactants and
solvated ions by intense polarization and quickly transferring reactant species
by convection and diffusion [132]. To selectively
etch further MAX phases devoid of Al and produce nitride MXenes [133] which are
difficult to produce by HF etching [4] molten salt
etching is the recommended technique. However, a fluorine-free molten salt
etching method has to be created since MXene made with fluoride salts
frequently has a fluorine terminal group [134]. Using etching of
Lewis acid molten salt, Li et al. synthesized many MXenes (NaCl/KCl/ZnCl2)
in 2019. Among these, KCl and NaCl were utilized to reduce the eutectic
system's melting point. The displacement interaction in the Al-MAX phases
between the Al atomic layer (Ti2AlN, V2AlC
Ti3AlC2,
and Ti2AlC)
and molten zinc chloride (ZnCl2) produced new Zn-MAX
phases (Ti2ZnN, V2ZnC,
Ti3ZnC2,
and Ti2ZnC,)
at 550°C. However, the high Lewis acidity of the molten ZnCl2
caused the new MAX phase to delaminate along with the introduction of sufficient
ZnCl2
(a molar ratio of Al-MAX/ZnCl2 = 1:6), resulting in the
formation of Cl-terminated MXenes [128]. In 2020, Li et
al. proposed a comprehensive Lewis acid etching process [127], which expanded
the scope of MAX phase etching beyond only Al-containing phases to include Ga,
Zn, and Si (non-Al-MAX phases). Lewis acidic molten salts and MAX phases may be
combined, and the mixture could then be heated to 750°C to create MXenes. CuCl2 molten salt was able to selectively
etch a Ti3SiC2
MAX phase, yielding a mixed powder of Ti3C2Tx/Cu.
The copper particles were further removed using a solution of ammonium
persulfate (APS, (NH4)2S2O8),
final result was Ti3C2Tx MXene
powder, which had surface-mounted Cl and O terminal groups. The A-site element
in the MAX phase may be etched by melted halide with a larger electrochemical
redox potential (V against Cl2/Cl−) than one with a lower electrochemical redox
potential (V against Cl2/Cl−). Melted halides with a higher electrochemical redox
potential (V versus Cl2/Cl−) than a lower one has a greater possibility of
etching the A-site element in the MAX phase. This is the etching principle. By
using molten salt etching (CuI/CuCl2/CuBr2), Li and associates created the
Ti3C2Tx MXene with ternary, binary, and unitary halogen terminals (such as I,
Cl, Br, ClBrI, and BrI) [133]. The salt ratio
in the etchants may be adjusted to change the ratio of the appropriate halogen-groups.
Additionally, the one-pot synthesis of both
the associated MXenes and MAX phases may be accomplished sustainably and
scalable via molten salt synthesis [135, 136]. However, it is
still difficult to delaminate MXenes made by molten salt synthesis into
single-layer flakes [137].
2.2.3 Electrochemical Method
Electrochemical etching
involves applying a potential difference between a MXene sample and a
counter/reference electrode in an electrolyte solution. This process can be
controlled in terms of voltage, current, time, and temperature. Electrochemical
etching can selectively remove specific layers of MXene, leading to tunable
properties [138]. This involves
applying an electric field to the MXene surface, causing ions to intercalate
and alter the surface chemistry. The advantages of this method include the
ability to control and tune the surface chemistry of MXenes, as well as the
potential for increased charge storage capacity and improved electrode
performance. The steps and principles of electrochemical etching involve
manipulating the electrochemical potential of the MXene material, and the
characteristics of this method include its flexibility and compatibility with
various electrolytes [139, 140]. The reactivity
differences between the M-C and M-Al bonds are the basis for chemical etching.
This states, that because electrochemical etching deals with the actual
transfer of charge, it is a reasonable substitute method. In a diluted HCl
solution, Al was successfully extracted electrochemically on a porous Ti2AlC
electrode by Sun et al. [141]. On Ti2AlC,
one may generate a layer of Ti2CTx MXenes.
Since no F ions were used in the electrochemical etching process, MXenes
containing just -OH, -Cl, and -O. groups were produced, in contrast to
chemical etching using HF or LiF/HCl [120]. The over-etching
of the MAX phase into carbon generated from carbines, however, may be the cause
of the electrochemical etching issues (CDC). To explain the electrochemical
etching of Ti2AlC into Ti2CTx
and CDC, a core-shell model was put forward. In order to produce MXenes without
overloading, it was suggested that etching parameters be properly adjusted. The
spectrum of possible MXene compositions and etching procedures has been
expanded by electrochemical etching [126].
2.2.4 Other Methods
Selective etching
techniques are often used in the fabrication of MXene materials. A few
bottom-up techniques that have surfaced recently include chemical vapor
deposition (CVD), atomic layer, salt-template, water-free etching, and much
more methods as illustrated in figure 4 [142]. For example, Xu et
al. used chemical vapor deposition (CVD) to create 2D ultrathin Mo2C
crystals [143]. Strong
anisotropy and superconducting transitions were seen in the 2D nanostructures
at magnetic fields. It was discovered that the thickness of the crystal
nanostructures strongly influenced the superconductivity. Other 2D TMC crystal
materials could be able to use this CVD method [144]. those created by
bottom-up processes, particularly chemical vapor deposition (CVD), have a
higher degree of crystalline clarity than those made by selective etching
methods. Rather than single-layered MXenes, these techniques have only created
multilayer ultrathin films [145]. Halim et al.
generated a thin-film Ti3AlC2
MAX phase by depositing components such as C, Al, and Ti onto a sapphire
substrate via magnetron sputtering. Furthermore, both non-MAX (Mo2Ga2C)
and thin films of the MAX phase (Mo2GaC)
may be made using direct magnetron sputtering, and they can subsequently be
used to synthesis epitaxial Mo2C films using simple selective chemical etching [142]. When compared to
MXene single crystals produced by wet chemical etching techniques, the
CVD-grown crystals exhibit a much-reduced fault density. For scaled-up
synthesis, the bottom-up approach must be laboriously pursued [81]. With the
development of MXenes, various techniques were successfully applied to produce
2D MXenes without the use of dangerous etchants, including UV-induced,
electrochemical, chemical vapor
deposition, physical vapor deposition (PVD),
spray drying, and thermal reduction [146, 147]. In table 2,
numerous possible synthetic techniques have been covered.
Figure 4:
Diagram illustrating various typical MXenes fabrication techniques [148].
2.3 Delamination
The "A" layers are removed one
at a time throughout the etching process and are displace with other functional
groups. The hydrogen and/or weak van der Waals bonds that occur hold
the resultant MXene layers together. Applying further delamination or
exfoliation treatment, permits the creation of few-layer or single MXene
flakes [70]. Mechanical
exfoliation or the intercalation approach may be used to achieve the multi-layered MXenes' delamination.
However, it is important to note that mechanical exfoliation can generate MXene
layers with strong interlayer connections, making it less effective for
achieving intercalation. On the other hand, the intercalation approach
specifically focuses on introducing intercalants to promote interlayer spacing
and create distinct nanosheets [149]. According
to research highly
sticky interlayer connections in MXenes generated by mechanical exfoliation
render this method ineffective, which are two- to six-fold stronger than those
seen in bulk MoS2 and graphite [150]. Furthermore, the
length of the sonication process alters the lamellar structure, reduces the
size of the MXene sheet, and creates structural flaws [151]. Ion
intercalation is proposed as a method for surface modification of MXene
materials due to its unique advantages, including charge and small size of
ions [152]. This process
plays a crucial role in modifying the lattice structure and regulating the
surface state of MXene materials, leading to the optimization of their
electronic and chemical properties [153]. When using the
intercalation process, intercalants are added to the mix to decrease the
distance between layers of MXene, lessen their interaction, and promote the
creation of distinct nanosheets. This greatly increases numerous surface
terminations and the surface area, which are directly connected to the
electrically conductive properties of MXene. Both ionic and organic
intercalants are commonly used for MXene intercalations. Ionic intercalants
include halide salts and metal hydroxides as aqueous solutions [154, 155]. Organic
intercalants include tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBAOH) [137] isopropyl amine [156] dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO) [157] tetra
propylammonium hydroxide (TPAOH) [158] bovine serum
albumin (BSA) [159] and n-butyllithium
[160].
Schematic representations
illustrating the two chemical modification procedures for the 2D Ti3C2Tx MXenes
are shown in figure 5. The sample intercalated with K+ ions was
referred to as K+Ti3C2Tx,
while the delaminated Ti3C2
was given the name d-Ti3C2.
The intercalation tests were conducted using both KOH and KOAc. XRD was used to
describe all of the Ti3C2Tx, KOH–Ti3C2,
KOAc–Ti3C2,
and d-Ti3C2
samples. The Ti3C2Tx MXenes'
increasing c-lattice parameter suggests that the interlayer spacings were
extended after the intercalation operations. The variation in the c-lattice
parameter for KOH and KOAc depended on other variables, such as pH level. For
example, the c-lattice parameter of KOH–Ti3C2
was bigger than that of KOAc–Ti3C2,
despite the fact that the -OH ion was
smaller than the acetate ion [161].
Figure 5:
Diagrams showing the delamination and K+ intercalation processes for the two
changes made to the Ti3C2Tx MXenes. Examples of the samples'
SEM pictures. Reproduced with permission ref [162]. Copyright © 2014, Elsevier.
3. Properties of MXenes
3.1 Structural Properties
Understanding the actions
of MXenes requires an in-depth understanding of their distinct atomic
structures. After the "A" elements are removed from the MAX phases,
the carbon and/or nitrogen (X) atoms and the transition metal (M) atoms combine
leaving the overall crystal structure to be of a close-packed hexagonal shape (figure
6) [163]. The sequencing
of M atoms within M2X exhibits a notable distinction compared to M3X2
and M4X3.
In M2X,
the arrangement follows an ABABAB order, while in M3X2
or M4X3,
the M atoms adhere to an ABCABC packing scheme [71].
Figure 6: Two-dimensional MXene
atomic structures (M2X, M3X2,
M4X3,
and M5X4)
Reproduced with permission [164]. Copyright
2019, Elsevier.
To determine the
structural properties of the MXenes, modeling modifications, and
structural pattern analysis are crucial [165]. Different
functionalized surfaces with functionalities including oxygen, hydroxyl, and
fluorinated functional groups are created on etching acid. For instance, the
largest theoretical metal ion storage capacity (e.g., ,
,
,
,
,
) is predicted to be
exhibited by the -O terminated MXenes [166]. In addition to
having a large sodium-ion storage capacity, the S-functionalized Ti3C2 MXene
also demonstrates a strong affinity towards polysulfide species, which could be
utilized as a prospective Li-SB host [167, 168]. Because of its vulnerability, metals
(Pb, Na, Mg, K, Ca, Li) can be used to replace the -OH terminations [169]. The
OH-terminated titanium carbide ML MXenes' original structure's modeling of the
density functional theory (DFT) really serves as the layered structure's basis.
[170]. The XRD data
obtained from both the experimentally synthesized and geometry-optimized
hydroxylated MXene were highly consistent, exhibiting a close and good
relationship with each other. The analysis of the XPS demonstrates the
formation of the O, F, and OH functions which further demonstrates the presence
of an incomplete or mixed termination at their surface. Additionally, there is
a chance that water molecules will intercalate into MXenes' multilayer
structure. Following the HF acid etching, the lack of the Ti3AlC2 MAX
phase and the elimination of crystallinity are determined by analyzing the XRD
pattern [171]. The primary
observation of MXenes was its hexagonally tightly packed (HCP) structure [172].
3.2 Electronic Properties
MXenes display several remarkable
properties, some of which include electrical properties that are affected by
the edge groups attached to their surfaces and their composition [173]. For
energy-related applications, MXene electrodes' electrochemical performance is
greatly influenced by their electronic characteristics [174]. One of MXenes'
most important electronic properties is undoubtedly its great electronic
conductivity [175]. metallic
behavior is exhibited by vast majority of MXenes that have surface
terminations. In order to enhance the metallic conductivity of the MXene,
several efforts have been undertaken in recent years. That being said, Ti3C2Tx MXene,
which is the very first one to have been discovered remains to be the most
conductive of all and also the most investigated one [176]. Similar to MXenes,
the free electrons from transition metals drive the metallic conductivity of
the solid solutions of MXenes without surface function groups (bare). Because
transition metal d electrons have extremely high density of states (DOS) close
to the Fermi level, the findings of the DFT calculation results indicate that MXene
without surface terminations behaves typically like a metal [177]. However, a large
number of surface terminations has been seen in MXene synthesized through
experiments. It is also very challenging to precisely evaluate
the type and number of these surface terminations. Moreover, in order to assess
the conductivity of MXene monolayer nanosheets, there exists a shortage of
modern characterization techniques which makes it difficult to further explore
the material's electronic properties. The findings of the HSE06
and Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) techniques, clearly shows that the MAX and Ti2X
phases possess metallic properties [178]. At the Fermi
level, however, the density of states of Ti2XT2
experiences a notable reduction.
MXene's band structure experiences
substantial change with the addition of surface terminations. Surface
terminations cause a substantial alteration in MXene's band structure. The peak
density of states decreases considerably when the d orbital of the transition
metal M and the p orbital of the end group are hybridized. In addition, a band
gap may also be created as a result of the elevation of the d orbital above the
Fermi level. Furthermore, a higher band gap is typically produced by a higher
atomic number of M [179]. Without the
termination groups, originally the MXene (Mn+1Xn)
and the MAX phase possess metallic characteristics, but they turn into semiconductors
when termination groups (Mn+1XnTx)
are added to them due to the formation of the band gap [163]. An
interesting approach, to impacting the conductivity of MXene is through cation
or organic molecule intercalation. By employing this method the resistance of
the device can increase significantly by more, than ten times when stacked
materials are involved [180]. Above 500 K
temperature, several Mo-based MXenes exhibit a notable increase in
temperature-dependent electric conductivity [181]. Furthermore, by
adjusting the external electric fields and the strain, adjustments can be made
to the electronic properties of MXenes [182]. For
example, it was demonstrated by Xiao's group that at a particular degree of
uniaxial and biaxial strain, Direct to indirect band gap transitions may occur
in monolayer Ti2CO2 [183]. The electronic
properties are also affected by the "M" in MXenes. For instance,
because the band gap of MXenes grows as the atomic number increases, the metal
electronegativity weakens with the rising atomic number [184]. To recapitulate,
most of the MXenes have outstanding electronic capabilities that contributes to
high performance in batteries, which is demonstrated by both the experimental
and computational analysis [185].
4. Applications in Electrochemical Energy
Storage
MXene electrodes have drawn a lot of
attention since the discovery of Ti3C2Tx
because they could be potentially used in upcoming batteries and other
electrochemical energy storage (EES) technologies, such as supercapacitors. Ti3C2Tx MXene
is the focus of most studies for LIBs, despite the fact that there exist many
EES systems and there's a broad family of MXenes. There has been rapid and
significant progress made recently in Research on MXenes advances rapidly
forward for a variety of different EES technologies beyond LIBs. Recent
discoveries in MXene-based materials such as SIBs, PIBs, Li-SBs and multivalent
ion (,
,
) batteries for EES other
than LIBs have attracted attention of different researcher [186].
4.1 Lithium–Sulfur Batteries (Li-S)
The abundant availability of sulfur and its
cost-effectiveness, makes the Li-S stands out as an extremely bright
possibility in electrochemical method for storing energy [187]. The Li-S battery system, which
consists of an organic liquid electrolyte, A sulfur composite cathode with a
lithium metal anode have the potential for extraordinarily high energy density (2567
Wh
) [188] and theoretical
specific capacity (1675 mA h
) [189]. Through the
formation of soluble polysulfides, these batteries' redox process moves forward
[190]. However, two major
problems with the Li-S have been the dissolution of polysulfide in the
electrolyte and the poor electrical conductivity of sulfur [191]. Accordingly,
large surface area, highly conducting 2D MXenes with plenty of functional
groups are attractive materials for Li-S, preventing the polysulfide shuttle
effect [192] due to their
hydrophilic surfaces, which may react chemically with intermediate polysulfides
[193, 194]. Notably, it has
recently been shown that MXenes with Te, S, Cl, Br, O, NH, and Se terminations
can be successfully synthesized [194]. For Na, Ca, K,
Li, and Mg intercalation, The lightest MXene Ti2C
with S termination has been explored at energy barriers smaller than 0.5 eV [195]. Lithium and sulfur undergo a redox process, which is
defined as 16Li + S8 → 8Li2S, to complete the charge/discharge operations as
seen, energy storage, and conversion of Li-S as shown in figure 7 [196].
Figure 7 (a-b): (A) An illustration of
Lithium and sulfur charge and discharge processes. Reproduced with permission [197] Copyright 2014,
American Chemical Society. (B) Li-S discharge and charge curves. Reproduced
with permission [198]. Copyright 2019,
Wiley-VCH.
4.1.1 MXene Sulfur Host
Among the sulfur hosts for Li-S batteries that show
the most promise is considered to be MXenes with extraordinary hydrophilicity
and conductivity [199]. MXenes were used
in lithium-sulfur battery cathodes for the first time in in 2015 by Liang et
al. According to them, the hydroxy groups and the Ti atoms on the surfaces
of MXene facilitated substantial chemical adsorption to soluble lithium
polysulfides, hence enhancing the battery performance by reducing the shuttle
effect [200]. The accordion-like
Ti3C2 MXene
was formulated by Zhao et al. using HF etching, and then directly coated
with sulfur using a melt-diffusion method to create an S/Ti3C2
composite having a sulfur concentration of 57.6 weight percent. This composite
demonstrated starting capacity of 1291 mAh g−1 at 200 mA , and after 100 cycles
still maintained 970 mAh
[201, 202]. Further
exploration and understanding of the structural characteristics of Li2Sx
and MXenes is required for advances in Li-S batteries. As illustrated in figure
8(a), Stable MXenes consist of five stacked hexagonal layers (atomic layers
O(F)-Ti-O(F)-N-Ti), namely Ti2NF2
and Ti2NO2 [203]. Above the Ti2NF2
and Ti2NO2
hexagonal phases, F and O termination groups are located. Therefore, the most
stable configurations are seen in Ti2N-based MXenes [204]. Researches on
lithium batteries shows that, S-containing clusters are usually formed by Li
ions during the process of discharge. The most stable Li-S structural
combination out of a variety of Li-S combinations that is known so far is Li2Sx.
Furthermore, the stability of the Li2Sx
can be confirmed by figure 8(b) which illustrates that all of the Li2Sx
structures are nonlinear and three-dimensional (3D) [205]. Understanding the structure of MXene
interaction with Li2Sx
requires understanding of the specific structures of MXenes and Li-S ions.
Electrostatic forces dominated the strong interaction between Li2Sx and Ti2NO2. Intercalation of the Li2Sx
structure occurs within the Ti2NO2
layer during lithiation [206].
Figure 8 (a-b):
(a) Ti2N-based MXene monolayers optimized structures (b) Li2Sx
species optimized structures. Gray, blue, red, purplish red, yellow, and blue
spheres symbolize the atoms N, Ti, O, F, S, and Li, respectively. Reproduced with
permission ref [207] Copyright (2019)
Elsevier.
Furthermore, all-MXene
electrodes have been proposed, wherein the two-dimensional delaminated Ti3C2
nanosheet interlayer physically and chemically blocks the transfer of lithium
polysulfides LiPSs, whilst the three-dimensional structures alkalized Ti3C2 exposed
surface area nanoribbon frameworks with several open macrospores make certain
high S loading and speedy ionic diffusion [208]. Additionally,
Huang et al. reported the assembly of a laminar MXene-Nafion film via
LBL. To generate the 1.0 mm modification layer, MXene sheets were stacked in an
orderly fashion with the Nafion inserted evenly into the interlayers. With
Nafion and MXene assembled, a physical barrier was provided to the LiPSs which
resulted in redox reactions and facilitated rapid ion and electron transit [209].
4..1.2 MXene Composite-Based Sulfur Hosts
4.3.1 MXene–Carbon Composites
In addition to building
three-dimensional MXene structures, another effective way to improve the
overall efficiency of Li-SBs is to combine MXene with other materials. Porous
carbon, graphene, carbon nanotube (CNT) and other carbon-based materials with
excellent mechanical strength and good conductivity are popular candidates [210, 211]. The intrinsic advantages of both
Carbon and MXenes are combined while constructing the MXene/Carbon composite.
Furthermore, for rapid ion transport, The carbons function as a
"spacer" to stop the MXene from restacking, and the MXene nanosheets
are used to increase the conductivity of the composites for quick electron
transit [41]. Moreover, the
carbon materials specifically the 2D graphene and the 1D CNTs, offer a
multitude of potential for the construction of advanced structures using MXene
nanosheets [212]. Consequently,
even at high sulfur loading, the sulfur cathode based on MXene/carbon composite
may obtain excellent electrochemical performance. The open structures and the
excellent conductivity of MXene/CNTs composites lead to both excellent
electrochemical performance and high sulfur loading [213]. One way to
generate 3D CNTs/MXene composite frameworks is to simply combine 2D MXene
nanosheets with 1D CNTs, which then serves as sulfur host. After 1200 cycles at
0.5 C, the as-prepared CNTs/Ti3CN (83 wt% sulfur
content), CNTs/Ti2C (83 wt% sulfur
content), and CNTs/Ti3C2
(79 wt% sulfur content) all maintained ≈450 mAh and demonstrated initial capacities above 1200
mAh g−1 at 0.05 C [214, 215]. Because of the strong
interaction between LiPSs and Mo atoms, The LiPS shuttle can also be suppressed
by Mo2C
MXene. A combination of Mo2C and CNTs with high electrical conductivity and an
increased surface area of 116.8 cm2 g−1 was produced by adding CNTs to Mo2C
MXene, which then was utilized as a sulfur host [216]. The Mo2C-CNTs/S
electrode, with 87.1 wt% sulfur content, showed 519 mAh
after 250 cycles at 0.1 C. Its initial
capacity was 1235 mAh
with 74.9% retention [217].
To improve the efficiency
of Li-S batteries, rGO and 2D graphene have been coupled with MXenes [218]. Several
three-dimensional MXene/graphene composite structures have been designed as
sulfur hosts to increase sulfur loading and ion transport [219]. A 3D porous
Ti3C2Tx
MXene/rGO hybrid aerogel was produced by hydrothermally processing Ti3C2Tx
MXene and GO composites and then freeze-drying the resulting material. This
aerogel was then used in Li-S batteries to store Li2S6 as a freestanding
cathode [220]. The 3D connected
MXene/rGO conductive network enables rapid electron transfer and fast Li+
diffusion, with capacities of 1270 mAh g−1 at 0.1 C, 5.27 mAh with 6 mg
sulfur loading, and 0.07%
capacity deterioration over 500 cycles at 1 C. Using a simple liquid
infiltration–evaporation technique, a novel kind of freestanding
three-dimensional porous hybrid aerogel of MXene and graphene was developed.
and utilized to load Li2S [221].
4.1.3 MXene–Metal Oxides Composites
MXene-metal oxide
composites are a family of materials that show great promise due to their
distinct characteristics and wide range of applications. These composites
incorporate the remarkable qualities of MXenes, including their great
electrical conductivity, mechanical flexibility, and chemical stability, with
the desirable characteristics of metal oxides, such as catalytic activity, high
specific surface area, and tunable band gaps. Recent developments in
MXene-metal oxide composites have focused on enhancing their performance in
several domains, including as electronics, sensing, catalysis, and energy
storage [222]. These composites
offer enhanced properties and functionalities compared to individual
components, opening up new possibilities for advanced materials and devices [223]. Strong chemical
interactions can occur between LiPSs and transition metal compounds, such as oxides
[211] and transition
metal sulfides[224]. Transition
metal compounds, when combined with MXenes, may efficiently increase the
chemisorption, lowering the 2D MXene nanosheets' tendency to stack again and
the shuttle effect using LiPSs. Despite the low electrical conductivity of
certain transition metal compounds [211] MXene's
metallic conductivity can compensate for it. Therefore, High conductivity
composites of MXenes and transition metal compounds are believed to improve
sulfur usage and a prospective sulfur host for Li-S batteries with a high
capacity to prevent the shuttle effect [225]. MXene-metal
oxide composites, including TiO2, SnO2,
and NiO, have been synthesized using various methods such as hydrothermal
synthesis, sol-gel method, and electrophoretic deposition. These methods allow
for the controlled incorporation of metal oxides into MXene structures,
resulting in unique composite materials with enhanced properties [226, 227].
4.1.4 MXene–Polymer Composites
The in situ
polymerization and ex situ blending processes may be used to mix MXenes with a
variety of polymers due to their surface's many active terminations [228, 229]. LiPS's
cumulative adsorption on the outside surface increases the likelihood for them
to dissolve into the electrolytes [230] even though
LiPS's dissolution could be somewhat mitigated by MXenes' strong polar surface.
This ultimately causes active materials to leak when the adsorption capacity
between outermost LiPS and MXene is not enough to stop LiPS from solvating in
organic electrolytes. In this regard, Yang and colleagues have recently
proposed a dual polysulfide confinement approach [231] in which sulfur
is inserted into Ti3C2Tx's
layer space and then covered in a thin layer of polydopamine (PDA). Ti3C2Tx
functions as an active 2D surface and a highly conductive skeleton to
chemically bond with LiPS. Also, as the XPS measurements showed that the coated
PDA layer could both chemically and physically clamp sulfur species in the MXene
nanosheets while preventing a direct contact between sulfur and the liquid
electrolyte. Additionally, the ternary composite's mechanical flexibility is
greatly enhanced by the coated PDA sheath which helps in maintaining the
cathode's structural integrity during charge and discharge [199]. Additionally, Ti3C2Tx MXene/polyethyleneimine
functionalized carbon nanotube (T@CP) composite was created using a
self-assembly technique for use as an anti-fouling separator and sulfur host.
This as-prepared T@CP product allows for outstanding electrochemical
performance toward the Li-SBs because of its well-organized porosity, dual
polarity, high conductivity, and excellent mechanical strength [232]. The as-prepared MXene/polymer
composite exhibits exceptional features, including better mechanical
properties, enhanced conductivity, and improved thermal stabilities, as a
result of the synergistic effect between organic polymer precursors and the
inorganic MXene. These properties can be tuned precisely by the types of MXene
and polymers and their composition [233].
4.2
MXenes for Lithium Anode Protection and Separator Modification
It has been shown that altering the
separators is a simple and efficient way to stop LiPSs from switching back and
forth between the anode and the cathode, which enhances the Li-S batteries'
electrochemical performance [234, 235]. Diverse
nanostructures of materials based on carbon have been used to alter separators.
Li-S batteries were constructed by Dou et al. using an eggshell membrane
modified with accordion-like Ti3C2Tx
particles as a separator. Ti3AlC2
was etched with an HF solution to produce the accordion-like Ti3C2Tx
particles. After 250 cycles at 0.5 C, the resulting Li-S batteries had a 74%
retention capacity [236]. Zhang et al.
created a 3D separator in Li-S batteries that was modified using Ti3C2Tx
aerogel. A cross-linked three-dimensional aerogel, Ti3C2Tx,
was created [237]. The high initial
discharge capacity of Li-S batteries with Ti3C2Tx
aerogel separators is 1487 mAh at 0.1 C (1C=1672 mAh
) and 670 mAh
at 2 C. With an ultra-low capacity decay rate
of 0.037% each cycle, the reversible discharge capacity of 424.3 mAh
at 1 C
is maintained for more over 1500 cycles, demonstrating exceptional cycling
stability and a long cycle life [238]. Additionally,
Zhang et al. modified PP separators by effectively fabricating MXene
based (poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate) Ti3C2Tx–PEDOT:
PSS hybrid. PEDOT: PSS in this hybrid may effectively stop Ti3C2Tx nanosheets
from restacking and improve Li-S battery electrical conductivity, which in turn
promotes quick Li+/electron transit and improves sulfur usage. In the
meanwhile, Ti3C2Tx
nanosheets are efficiently anchored to polysulfide by the addition of Ti3C2Tx–PEDOT:
PSS, which prevents the shuttle effect. Consequently, Li–S cells using
modified-separators Ti3C2Tx–PEDOT:PSS
have exceptional performance, exhibiting a long cycling stability, a high
discharge capacity of 1241.4 mA h
at 0.2C, and a low degradation rate of 0.030%
per cycle at 0.5C for 1000 cycles [239]. More research
was done by to determine how the MXene modified separator for Li-SBs performed
electrochemically in relation to thickness by Han et al. They discovered
that as the thickness of the MXene layers on the separator decreases, the
lithium-ion diffusion coefficient rises. Particularly at the lowest MXene a
thickness of 100 nm, or mass loading of 0.016 mg
, the shuttling of LiPS
species was effectively suppressed [240]. A novel method for
designing and fabricating separators in a variety of industries is provided by
a modified material's structural design that anchors LiPSs. Other composites
based on MXene that exhibit superior electrochemical performance have also been
employed as the interlayer or separator coating between the cathode and the
separator [241]. These composites
include 3D CNTs/MXene, [242] TiO2/MXene,
[243] nitrogen-doped
MXene carbon nanosheet-nickel, [244], and Ti3C2Tx
nanosheet@Cu/Fe-MOF [245].
The effective functioning of Li-S battery
performance is impeded by the dissolved LiPSs causing the Li metal anode to
severely corrode. Despite this, the anode component has not garnered as much
attention as the cathode designs, which have been the subject of substantial
research. Lamellar-structured MXenes have nanoscale gaps that help regulate the
deposition of lithium. A flexible Ti3C2
MXene possessing a 950 mAh high reversible capacity was prepared in order
to demonstrate this notion [246, 247]. Moreover, as figure
9 illustrates, uniform Li nucleation may be guided by MXene based on Ti3C2Tx
(T=−F, −OH) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO), which promotes dendritic-free and
extremely reversible Li plating/stripping. For more than a millennia, this Li
anode has exceptional cycle stability, even at large area capacities (3 mAh
) and very high rates (10
mA
) [248].
Figure 9 (a-c): The uniform
development of Li and prevention of Li anode corrosion by LiPSs are provided by
the Ti3C2Tx/rGO/well-aligned
layered structure. a) Concept for moving LiPSs to the anode of lithium
from the sulfur cathode. b) LiPSs-induced dendritic development and
corrosion of the anode for a bare Li anode. c) Li growth without dendrites and
suppression of LiPS for the composite anode of Li-rGO/Ti3C2Tx. Reproduced with the
permission ref [248]. Copyright 2019,
Wiley-VCH.
4.3 Sodium-Ion
Storage (SIBs)
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) may be
replaced with sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) for grid-scale energy storage. This
is because sodium has a similar low potential to lithium, and sodium is also
cheaper. This has been supported by research [249, 250]. Similar in
energy density to LIBs, sodium-ion batteries have a sufficient redox potential
(E0 Na+/Na = 2.71 V vs SHE). Supercapacitors (SIBs) may outperform lithium-ion batteries
(LIBs) regarding the storage of electrochemical energy [251]. However, because
of the slow kinetics and substantial volume variability in the
charge/discharge process of SIBs because of the big Na+ radius. In light of the
current situation, the discovery of MXenes with a two-dimensional lamellar
structure, adjustable spacing between layers, strong conductivity, and a low
barrier for Na+ diffusion presents a promising chance to address the challenges
faced by SIBs and enhance their electrochemical capabilities [252, 253].
When used as
anode materials, the electrochemical efficiency of SIBs intimately connected to
the surface groups of MXenes [251]. For instance, although the -O and -N groups promote Na+
storage, the and -OH and -F groups raise the Na+ diffusion barrier and decrease
MXenes' ability to store Na+. Figure 10 illustrates how Xia et al.
[254] demonstrated a modified N surface group on MXenes that
improves SIB cycle stability and boosts Na+ storage capacity. In this work,
cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) is calcined to add N groups while still
preserving the structure of MXenes.
Figure
10: Simulation models of Ti3C2 and Ti3C2-N and illustration of the SEI compositions in the Ti3C2-N anode
[254].
Doping MXenes
with elements like sulfur and nitrogen has been shown to improve their
electrical conductivity and sodium storage capacity. For example, sulfur-doped
MXene (Ti3C2S2) demonstrated high sodium storage capacity with low diffusion
barriers [255, 256].
Modifying the MXene's interlayer spacing nanosheets can enhance the sodium
storage capacity and improve the kinetics of sodiation/desodiation. Metal ion
pillaring and intercalation of sulfur atoms have been employed to increase the
interlayer spacing, resulting in improved capacity and cycling stability [257, 258].
Also, creating mesoporous or 3D porous MXene structures can enhance the active
material utilization and reduce ion diffusion distances. This design approach
has shown promising results in improving the capacity and cycle life of
sodium-ion batteries based on MXene [259, 260].
4.3.1 MXene-Based
Composite
It has been
demonstrated that ne effective method for enhancing the electrochemical
efficiency of MXene-based anodes for sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) is to combine
MXenes with high-capacity anode materials. Significant improvements in battery
performance, including as lowering the ion diffusion barrier, using fewer
electrolytes, and increasing cycle stability, are made possible by the special shape
of MXene-based anodes in SIBs [261]. For instance, a free-standing Na2C6O6/MXene hybrid paper with exceptional
flexibility was created by Feng's group [262]. Because of its high theoretical capacity of 501 mAh g−1, Na2C6O6 is a
potential anode material in SIBs. But it has problems including low
conductivity, quick capacity loss, and electrolyte dissolution. The researchers
were able to overcome these obstacles and fully use the high theoretical
specific capacity of Na2C6O6 by mixing it with MXenes. The Na2C6O6/MXene flexible anodes demonstrated
a remarkable capacity of 231 mAh g−1. Zhang and coworkers [263] conducted a study where they compounded MXene with red phosphorus
through high-energy ball-milling. The red P/Ti3C2Tx composite, as prepared,
demonstrated robust sodium storage capabilities. P-O-Ti linkages, which
completely combined the conductive MXene material with the high-capacity red
phosphorus, are responsible for this. Sodium-ion batteries' electrochemical
performance was improved when these two materials were combined through
alloying processes. [264]. A composite of Si and MXene self-assembled in Wang's work [265] through electrostatic interaction between Si NPs and FL-MXene that
had been treated with acetone. The composite included a well-thought-out
FL-Si/MXene structure that combined MXene microspheres and activated Si NPs
with controlled interlayer spacing and strong structural stability. Figure
11 illustrates the numerous research that have been published in recent
years on anodes for sodium ion storage using materials based on MXene [266].
Figure
11: An overview of notable recent MXene-based anode works in chronological
order. Reproduced with the permission of Ref [266] Copyright 2022, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society.
4.4 Potassium-Ion Storage
Potassium-ion batteries (PIBs) are a
promising substitute for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and sodium-ion batteries
(SIBs) due to the suitable potential of potassium (K) metal, which is less than
that of Na and close to that of Li. These batteries have higher specific
energy, power density, faster ion diffusion, low cost and sustainability, and
compatibility with existing infrastructure. They can potentially be integrated
into the current lithium-ion battery manufacturing infrastructure with only
minor modifications [267, 268].
K ions have greater ionic radii (0.138 nm)
than Li+ (0.076 nm) and Na (0.0106 nm) ions. This means that during the
potassiation/depotassium process, there will likely be more severe volume
variation, which will restrict the types of materials that may be used for PIB
electrodes [261]. Early calculations have demonstrated potential K ion
intercalation into conducting 2D MXenes with a substantial interlayer gap,
suggesting an appropriate anode material for PIBs with high capacities [269]. Following that, 2D MXene materials containing Nb2CTx, Ti3C2Tx, and Ti3CNTx were experimentally created as
components of anode materials for PIBs [270, 271]. When Ti3C2Tx was first investigated by Naguib et al. [272] as an electrode material
for PIBs, the resulting curves showed that after 100 cycles of charge and
discharge, the reversible capacity remained at 75 mAh . For instance,
Zhang et al. [273] used electrostatic adsorption of Ti3C2Tx with positively charged melamine to
create a 3D MXene scaffold. The 3D structured MXene scaffold possesses key
characteristics that enhance its efficacy as an anode material for potassium
ion batteries (PIBs). Its numerous surface sites and efficient ion transport
pathways serve to increase potassium ion storage capability and accelerate
dynamics. In electrochemical testing, the 3D Ti3C2Tx MXene exhibited elevated performance,
achieving a high specific capacity of 161.4 mAh/g over numerous
charge-discharge cycles while maintaining excellent stability. These results
indicate that compared to other anode materials explored for PIBs, MXenes may
represent a superior option due to their ability to facilitate higher potassium
intercalation and faster transfer kinetics, attributes originating from their
unique three-dimensional network architecture. PIBs rely heavily on their metal
anodes. Nonetheless, the unexpected development of dendrites and it is very
challenging to reversibly plate and strip potassium metal during cycling due to
the continuous electrolyte consumption. Remarkably, the MXenes might serve as a
three-dimensional scaffold to promote consistent K+ deposition, adapt to
volumetric variations, and maintain the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI)
during cycling. A composite of MXene/carbon nanotube (DN-MXene/CNT) lacking in
titanium and containing nitrogen was created by Tang et al.
[274] as the 3D skeleton to include K+ metal. Consequently, the
K@DN-MXene/CNT electrode displays an outstanding cycle stability and a
morphology devoid of dendrites. This work shows that MXenes is an excellent
three-dimensional skeleton for boosting K metal stability in batteries. By
using a hydrothermal process, TiO2/reduced graphene oxide (rGO) composites
based on 2D MXene have been developed by Fang et al. [275] with an enhanced and practical capacitive capacity for LIBs and
PiBs. TiO2/rGO, with its long cycle time and enormous capacity, was the cathode
of choice for PiBs and LiBs. Rate performance and capacity were enhanced by rGO.
Researchers studying batteries across the world have been interested in
metal-based anode materials because of their effective conductivity and energy
densities. These materials include antimony (Sb), bismuth (Bi), and tin (Sn).
Significant volume growth has also been shown to cause fast deterioration.
Later, using the electrodeposition approach, Tian et al. successfully developed
a glycol-based system including Sb, Bi, and Sn on MXene paper [276]. These materials allow potassium ions to diffuse over short
distances, causing volume change in the potassium and depotassium technique.
MXene sheets have strong conductivity and efficiency in flexibility [277]. These qualities allowed it to be used as an elastic collector for
electronic transmissions and to adjust volume changes during the circulation
process.
Multivalent
Ion Storage (Mg, Al, Zn)
4.5 Zinc Ion Batteries
Earth-abundant, Low-cost Zn
metal has a suitable redox potential (-0.76 V against SHE), ensuring a broad
voltage window in aqueous electrolytes [278]. An aqueous zinc ion battery is made up of a mild electrolyte, a
cathode, and zinc foil anode (for example, 2 M ZnSO4) that is both safe and environmentally
friendly [279]. Because of their inherent wettability with aqueous electrolytes, for
ZIB electrode designs, 2D MXene nanosheets with a conductive core and
hydrophilic surface show potential. Although ZIBs' energy densities are not
equal to those of LIBs, they could be helpful in situations where extreme
safety is required because they don't have the burning risk that comes with
organic electrolyte-based MIBs.
The materials
used in traditional ZIB battery cathodes include those based on manganese (Mn),
vanadium (V), and Prussian blue equivalents. Hybridizations using nanocarbon or
MXene nanosheet materials are also possible [280, 281].
Electrostatic host material Zn2+ ion interaction is one of the most challenging problems for aqueous
ZIB cathodes [282]. For aqueous ZIBs to integrate with MnO2, a variety of carbon-based
compounds have been used as a conducting medium [283]. 2D MXenes exhibit high density, exceptional hydrophilicity, rich
surface functionality, and strong metallic conductivity (4 g ) [284]. It was recently suggested by Minjie Shi et al. [282] that the 3D micro-flower-like structure, when cycled with highly
electroactive MnO2, not only offers exceptional structural stability but also
enhances electrical conductivity. With a remarkable rate capacity and a high
reversible capacity of 301.2 mAh
, the 3D Ti3C2Tx@MnO2 micro-flower
exhibits outstanding cycling stability over 2000 cycles. When cycling ZIBs
using V2CTx MXene as the cathode material, Li et al. saw an extraordinary
performance boost [285]. This is because, during exfoliation and cycling, V2CTx oxidizes into V2O5, yielding an
energy density of 386.2 Wh K
and a capacity
of 508 mAh
. By using
highly stabilized ZMO nanoparticles (ZMO@Ti3C2Tx) as a cathode for aqueous ZIBs
(less expensive than pristine ZMO-based cathode material). This is because,
during exfoliation and cycling, V2CTx oxidizes into
V2O5, yielding an energy density of 386.2 Wh K
and a capacity
of 508 mAh
. By using
highly stabilized ZMO nanoparticles (ZMO@Ti3C2Tx) as a cathode for aqueous ZIBs
(less expensive than pristine ZMO-based cathode material). Minjie Shi et al.
[286] were able to prevent irreversible scaffold degradation caused by
high conductivity and ZMO side reactions. This resulted in a comparatively high
cycling stability and reversible capacity over 5000 cycles. The electrochemical
activity of zinc ion storage energy may be improved by structurally altering
MXene. Ti2CTX preintercalated with Sn4+ and with a notably larger interlayer
gap is arranged vertically above carbon spheres [287]. This structure increases ion transport and improves
diffusion kinetics, resulting in increased electrochemical storage of zinc
ions. The Sn4+-Ti2CTX/C electrode has remarkable cycling stability in zinc-ion
capacitors. MXene is commonly utilized in zinc-ion capacitors (particularly
flexible ones). However, the types of ion storage and storage processes require
additional investigation, and electrochemical performance must be improved by
structural design [288]. Zinc-ion batteries have been made using a variety of materials,
including organic compounds, V-based materials, Mn-based materials, and
Prussian blue analogues, but each has drawbacks. Making full use of MXene's
structure and physicochemical properties is one potential technique for
overcoming these active materials' inherent weaknesses. Combining different
active materials can improve their electrochemical characteristics and provide
complementing advantages. Additionally, a complete investigation and
understanding of the energy storage and action processes is imperative for the
advancement of zinc-ion energy storage and the utilization of MXenes [288].
4.6 Magnesium-Ion Storage
The promise of
higher volumetric energy densities than LIBs makes multivalent ion
batteries enticing—like Al3+, Zn2+, Mg2+,
and Ca2+ [289, 290]. Magnesium is a viable contender due to its abundant resources
(104 times Li), large theoretical capacity (2 219 mAh g-1),
and low redox potential (−2.37 V vs. SHE). Mg ions' bivalence makes them a
suitable anode material, with an ultra-high volumetric capacity of 3,833 mAh cm−3
[291]. There has been a lot of interest in rechargeable magnesium-ion
batteries (MIBs) with metal anodes made of magnesium (Mg) since the pioneering
work of Aurbach et al. [292]. The lack of dendritic development, the cheaper cost resulting
from the earthly abundance of magnesium, and the ability to handle the metal in
an ambient environment make MIBs safer than LIBs [293]. On the other hand, slow ion diffusion kinetics and strong ion-electrode
interactions are caused by the divalent charge of Mg2+ ions. Today,
MIBs continue to face challenges related to the absence of stable electrolytes
and appropriate cathodes that permit quick diffusion/intercalation of Mg2+
ions [294]. A theoretical capacity
of up to 1050 mAh g-1 is possible due
to the formation of bilayers and trilayers by Mg2+ ions on the MXene
surface, as shown by previous simulations [295]. For this reason, there
have been many efforts to use MXene-based materials for MIBs. For instance, the
performance of novel Ti3C2Tx was poor, whereas Xu et
al. showed the potential of CTAB intercalated Ti3C2Tx MXene for
Mg-ion storage [296]. The Ti3C2Tx/CTAB
electrode, in its prepared state, demonstrated exceptional rate capability and
a high capacity of 300 mAh cm−3 at 50 mA g-1. The DFT results
showed that the greatly increased performance was due to a lower diffusion
barrier (approximately 0.19 eV) of Mg2+ ions on the MXene surface.
In order to enable MoS2 composite for MIBs, the same group also synthesized Ti3C2Tx MXene [297]. A petal-like MoS2/MXene hybrid
was produced by vertically loading MoS2 nanosheets on Ti3C2Tx MXene
nanosheets by a hydrothermal reaction between Na2MoO4 and NH2CSNH2 at 210 °C.
Notably, the electrical conductivity of MoS2 was significantly enhanced for
high-capacity use by the presence of MXene. As a result, at 5 mA g-1, 165 mAh g-1was achieved, a much higher value
than the 62 mAh g-1of pure MoS2 anode [297]. Additionally,
enhanced performance was achieved by preparing VS4 anchored on
Ti3C2 MXene as a
high-performance cathode material for magnesium ion batteries [298]. While the MoS2/MXene hybrid
with vertically loaded model is a promising demonstration in the early research
stage of MIBs, the performance of the magnesium storage is not very
satisfactory.
4.7 Aluminum-Ion
Storage
AIBs offer
excellent mass-specific capacity (2980 mAh g-1) and volumetric
capacity (8406 mAh cm−3), great safety, and affordability making
them the most promising energy storage solution. The upper crust of the earth
contains large amounts of aluminum elements (around 8%) [299]. However, several challenges persist regarding the use of AIBs,
including the difficult-to-synthesize high-specific capacity cathode
materials, short cycle life, and limited electrolyte substitutes. Thus, the
primary objective in the development of AIBs systems is to design and
manufacture cathode materials with high specific capacity and cycling
stability. As a common 2D material, MXenes show great potential as
high-capacity cathode materials in AIBs. Beidaghi et al. [110] for example, used few-layer V2CTx MXene as the
cathode material for AIBs and demonstrated a high capacity of 300 mAh g−1. In
order to manufacture a single-layered Nb2CTx MXene for use
as the cathode material in AIBs, Tu's group[300] produced a first charge capacity of 275 mAh g-1.
MXene@N-doped carbon@ Ni0.6C00.4S composite was created by Zheng et
al.[299] to serve as the cathode material for AIBs. MXene served as the
substrate for the Ni0.6C00.4S solid solution. The strong MXene
support layer enhances the composite's chemical stability and structural
integrity in addition to providing a quicker ion and electron transmission
channel. The anode demonstrated a high capacity of 481.2 mAh g-1 with
the help of MXene. According to these studies, MXenes have the potential to
function as efficient cathode materials for AIBs. The aforementioned studies
demonstrate that MXenes is a promising substrate material in addition to being
a superior cathode material for high-capacity AIBs. When used as a substrate,
MXenes may enhance the overall characteristics of composite materials and
assist active compounds in reaching their full potential.
4.8 Anode Protection for Metal Batteries
Energy storage systems
with a greater energy density are now needed for electric cars and portable
gadgets. Because metal anodes (such as Zn, K, Li, and Na) have large
theoretical specific capacities, metal-air, metal-sulfur, metal-CO2, and
metal-oxygen batteries —
exhibit
energy densities much greater than LIBs. However, the high reactivity,
irregular dendritic growth, safety concerns, low long-term durability, and substantial
volumetric changes during cycling of metal anodes hinder their development [301]. As a result, a
great deal of research has been done to address these issues, with metal anode
shielding emerging as one successful strategy. In order to protect metal anodes
against uneven dendritic growth, three techniques have been developed: i) modifying
metal anodes (e.g., controlling electrochemical processes to control metal
deposition, or regulating metal diffusion to capture metals in porous hosts); ii) covering the metal anodes with an artificial SEI
film; iii) electrolyte engineering to produce stable and safe metal anodes [302]. Three-dimensional
porous current collectors with large surface areas and lithophilic coatings can
normalize lithium-ion flux to suppress dendrite formation. Separator
modifications like surface coatings with nanoparticles or multilayer films
offer enhanced ionic conductivity and mechanical strength while hindering
dendrites and side reactions. Electrolyte additives such as halogen salts,
water, nitrates, and fluoroethylene carbonate form stable solid electrolyte
interphase layers that guide uniform lithium deposition. Developing high
conductivity solid-state electrolytes remains challenging but offers excellent
safety through suppressing dendrites and side reactions [303]. Certain
advantageous properties of materials based on MXene are helpful for effective
metal anode protection. For example, large interlayer spacing may significantly
reduce volumetric changes during metal plating and stripping; homogeneous
nucleation and growth of metals on MXene surfaces is induced by the 2D
structure; and rapid electronic and ionic transport is made possible by MXenes'
high conductivity and hydrophilicity. Furthermore, at the anode/electrolyte
interface, the fluorine termination may result in the development of
homogeneous, dense, and long-lasting SEI films that are dominated by LiF salt [304]. As a
result, enormous efforts have been made to use MXenes to safeguard metal anodes.
4.9 Lithium Metal Anode
MXenes are potential
materials for lithium metal anodes due to their large interlayer spacing and
electrochemical activity. Unlike graphite anodes, MXenes can readily
intercalate lithium ions with minimal lattice distortion. Their theoretical
capacities are higher than graphite and they have slightly higher lithiation
potentials, which may help reduce lithium dendrite formation. Dendrites pose
significant safety hazards as they can cause short circuits. MXenes aim to
suppress dendrites through various strategies [247]. Artificial solid
electrolyte interfaces can be constructed on MXene surfaces through inorganic
or organic coatings to facilitate uniform lithium-ion transport.
Three-dimensional porous current collectors provide large surface areas and
lithiophilic coatings to homogenize lithium plating. Separator modifications
like surface coatings or multilayer designs enhance ionic conductivity and
mechanical strength while hindering dendrites. Electrolyte additives such as
salts or polymers form stable solid electrolyte interphase layers that guide
uniform lithium deposition. Delamination and porous architectures increase
interlayer spacing for facile lithium intercalation. Carbon and metal oxide
composites utilize pseudo capacitance and conductive networks for high
capacities. Perpendicular MXene arrays (MXene–Li arrays) have been shown to
have ordered interspaces at both the nanometer and micrometer scales [305]. This
architecture reduces the "lightning rod effect" and volume changes
during plating, leading to dendrite-free lithium deposition with high-rate
capabilities. The tunable interlayer spacing of MXenes also allows compositing
with high-capacity Si for lithium metal anodes. In addition to MXene/rGO
aerogel [306] and MXene/graphene
framework, [307] additional 3D
scaffolds for Li metal anodes, including thin lithium electrodes with
interlayer calation [308] were intended for
lithium metal batteries without dendrites [309]. Qian et al.
inhibited the formation of lithium dendrites by inducing isotropic lithium
nucleation and growth on MXene films using an amorphous liquid metal nucleation
seed [310]. Overall, the
sensible microscale design of MXene-based anodes holds promise for reliable
lithium metal batteries.
5. Other Metal Anodes (Zn, K, Na)
MXene-based Materials are also being utilized to stop the formation of dendrites
in metal anodes other than lithium metal anode. A Sn2+
pillared
Ti3C2 MXene
scaffold (CT-Sn(II)@Ti3C2),
for example, has been reported by Li et al. as a stable matrix for
sodium metal anodes free of dendrites with great performance [311]. Dendrite
development on the favorable locations may be efficiently prevented by the
sodiophilic seeds' (Sn2+) intercalation into the MXene
layers. In the meanwhile, additional sodium ions may be accommodated and
volumetric change can be mitigated by the enlarged interlayer distance. In
order to create a dendritic-free K-S battery anode, Wang et al.
developed a free-standing MXene/CNT host for potassium metal (K@DN-MXene/CNT)
that is nitrogen-containing and defect-rich [274]. During
plating/stripping, the highly conductive scaffold's quick K+
diffusion and electronic transport decreased the local current density and
created a uniform ionic flow. The ability of the 3D scaffold to cause
homogenous nucleation and, therefore, a uniform distribution of potassium was
confirmed by both theoretical calculations and experimental findings.
Interestingly, the flexible and free-standing Ti3C2Tx MXene@Zn
paper has been shown by Qian et al. to have potential use as a matrix
for lithium metal batteries. that are nonaqueous and those that are aqueous [40]. In the
first instance, the MXene@Zn films' strong conductivity and excellent
hydrophilicity made it possible for the reversible and stable zinc
plating/stripping procedure. In contrast, zinc from the MXene@Zn host acted as
the nucleation agent in the latter case due to the Zn–Li alloy interaction.
As can be seen from the
above data, Materials based on MXene have demonstrated tremendous promise in
shielding metal anodes from dendritic development because of their many surfaces
functional groups, especially the -F, large interlayer spacing, and high
conductivity. It should be highlighted, nonetheless, that further research is
needed in this area since we're still in the early stages of using MXenes for
metal anode protection.
5.1 Conclusion and Future Perspectives
MXenes have shown great
potential owing to their qualities, as anode materials for different metal-ion
batteries such as wide interlayer spacing, high electrical conductivity, and
surface functionalities. As an anode material for Li-ion batteries, MXenes can
intercalate Li ions with minimal lattice distortion and offer higher capacities
than graphite. However, the challenge remains in obtaining high power and energy
densities due to their pseudocapacitive behavior. MXenes have also been
investigated for Na-ion and K-ion batteries with theoretical capacities over
200 mAh/g in some cases. However, experimental capacities are lower due to
challenges associated with intercalating larger ions. To further improve
performance, MXenes have been developed as composites with various metal
oxides, sulfides, and silicon to take advantage of their synergistic effects.
This allows much higher capacities and electrochemical utilization compared to
pristine MXenes or other components alone. 3D nanostructures have also shown
benefits by providing shorter ion diffusion paths and preventing flake
restacking. Protecting MXenes from oxidation is also critical to achieving
long-term cycling stability in practical applications. Still, further work is
needed to optimize MXenes composition and surface functionality to promote
discrete redox peaks suitable for battery operation. Developing controlled 3D
architectures while maintaining high mass loadings will be important to fully
realize rate and capacity benefits. Understanding capacity-enhancing effects
like interfacial storage is also important. Finally, protecting MXenes from
oxidation through carbon coatings or novel synthesis requires more thorough
characterization and cycle-life testing. Some perspectives and outlooks for
future study are presented as below in figure 12.
Figure 12: Schematic
showing the future possible directions.
A deeper understanding of
the in-situ growth mechanisms from nucleation to formation is needed.
Theoretical studies could provide insights into these mechanisms to guide
experimental work. Advanced characterization techniques may help analyze the
growth processes and role of composites in batteries. Surface chemistry changes
before and after growth are currently unknown but likely impact performance.
Developing green and low-cost synthesis methods applicable to in situ growth is
important for scalability. Larger scale testing under practical conditions is
needed beyond coin cells. Finally, application of in situ MXene composites in
novel battery systems like aluminum, magnesium and iron ion batteries holds
promise but has not been extensively explored yet. Overall, broadening the
scope of MXenes and growth conditions analyzed, deeper mechanistic
understanding, and moving towards applied testing and synthesis approaches are
highlighted as important future directions for the field.
Author Contributions: K. Ullah: Study design, data
collection, data analysis, data interpretation, and original draft preparation;
N. Alam: conceptualization, methodology, study design, data collection, data
analysis, data interpretation, reviewing and editing; S. Udin: formal analysis,
data collection, and data analysis; W.C. Oh: formal analysis, final draft
revision. All authors have read and
agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This
research received no external funding.
Data Availability
Statement: Not applicable.
Conflicts of
Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
[1] M.
Zhao et al., "Advances in
Two-Dimensional Materials for Optoelectronics Applications," Crystals, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 1087, 2022.
[Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/12/8/1087.
[2] Y. Lei et al., "Graphene and Beyond:
Recent Advances in Two-Dimensional Materials Synthesis, Properties, and
Devices," (in eng), ACS Nanosci Au, vol.
2, no. 6, pp. 450-485, Dec 21 2022, doi: 10.1021/acsnanoscienceau.2c00017.
[3] N. Alam,
H. Ihsan, S. Khan, and K. Ullah, "Graphene Quantum Dots-Based Composites
for Biomedical Applications," in Innovations
and Applications of Hybrid Nanomaterials: IGI Global, 2024, pp. 62-90.
[4] Y.
Gogotsi and B. Anasori, "The rise of MXenes," vol. 13, ed: ACS Publications, 2019, pp.
8491-8494.
[5] Z. Yang,
Y. Zheng, W. Li, and J. Zhang, "Investigation of two‐dimensional hf‐based
MXenes as the anode materials for li/na‐ion batteries: A DFT study," Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol.
40, no. 13, pp. 1352-1359, 2019.
[6] Y. An,
Y. Tian, H. Shen, Q. Man, S. Xiong, and J. Feng, "Two-dimensional MXenes
for flexible energy storage devices," Energy
& Environmental Science, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 4191-4250, 2023.
[7] P. Das,
Y. Dong, X. Wu, Y. Zhu, and Z.-S. Wu, "Perspective on high entropy MXenes
for energy storage and catalysis," Science
bulletin, vol. 68, no. 16, pp. 1735-1739, 2023.
[8] X. Xu,
T. Guo, M. Lanza, and H. N. Alshareef, "Status and prospects of
MXene-based nanoelectronic devices," Matter,
2023.
[9] S.
Iravani, "Role of MXenes in advancing soft robotics," Soft Matter, vol. 19, no. 33, pp.
6196-6212, 2023.
[10] Z.
Otgonbayar and W.-C. Oh, "Comprehensive and multi-functional MXene based
sensors: An updated review," FlatChem,
p. 100524, 2023.
[11] Y. Li et al., "Toward smart sensing by
MXene," Small, vol. 19, no. 14,
p. 2206126, 2023.
[12] S.
Nikazar, Z. Mofidi, and M. Mortazavi, "Cancer Theranostic Applications of
MXenes," in Age of MXenes, Volume 2.
Applications in Diagnostics, Therapeutics, and Environmental Remediation:
ACS Publications, 2023, pp. 19-46.
[13] N. Rabiee
and S. Iravani, "MXenes and their composites: a versatile platform for
biomedical applications," Materials
Chemistry Horizons, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 171-184, 2023.
[14] F. Zhao et al., "Constructing Artificial
SEI Layer on Lithiophilic MXene Surface for High-Performance Lithium Metal
Anodes," Advanced Science, vol.
9, no. 6, p. 2103930, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202103930.
[15] L. Jiang et al., "2D single-and few-layered
MXenes: synthesis, applications and perspectives," Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 10, no. 26, pp. 13651-13672,
2022.
[16] A. Inman et al., "Shear delamination of
multilayer MXenes," Journal of
Materials Research, vol. 37, no. 22, pp. 4006-4016, 2022.
[17] T.
Kshetri et al., "Recent advances
in MXene-based nanocomposites for electrochemical energy storage
applications," Progress in Materials
Science, vol. 117, p. 100733, 2021/04/01/ 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100733.
[18] A. K.
Tareen et al., "Recent advance
in two-dimensional MXenes: New horizons in flexible batteries and
supercapacitors technologies," Energy
Storage Materials, 2022.
[19] Y. Huang et al., "Flexible MXene films for
batteries and beyond," Carbon
Energy, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 598-620, 2022.
[20] Y. Liu et al., "In‐situ electrochemically
activated surface vanadium valence in V2C MXene to achieve high capacity and
superior rate performance for Zn‐ion batteries," Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 31, no. 8, p. 2008033, 2021.
[21] A.
VahidMohammadi, J. Rosen, and Y. Gogotsi, "The world of two-dimensional
carbides and nitrides (MXenes)," Science,
vol. 372, no. 6547, p. eabf1581, 2021.
[22] Y. Liu et al., "Sulfonic-Group-Grafted
Ti3C2T x MXene: A Silver Bullet to Settle the Instability of Polyaniline toward
High-Performance Zn-Ion Batteries," ACS
nano, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 9065-9075, 2021.
[23] V.
Kamysbayev et al., "Covalent
surface modifications and superconductivity of two-dimensional metal carbide
MXenes," Science, vol. 369, no. 6506,
pp. 979-983, 2020.
[24] D. Yuan et al., "Atomically thin materials
for next-generation rechargeable batteries," Chemical Reviews, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 957-999, 2021.
[25] K. Fan,
Y. Ying, X. Li, X. Luo, and H. Huang, "Theoretical investigation of V3C2
MXene as prospective high-capacity anode material for metal-ion (Li, Na, K, and
Ca) batteries," The Journal of
Physical Chemistry C, vol. 123, no. 30, pp. 18207-18214, 2019.
[26] S. S.
Shinde, N. K. Wagh, S. H. Kim, and J. H. Lee, "Li, Na, K, Mg, Zn, Al, and
Ca Anode Interface Chemistries Developed by Solid‐State Electrolytes," Advanced Science, p. 2304235, 2023.
[27] C. Wei et al., "Recent advances of
emerging 2D MXene for stable and dendrite‐free metal anodes," Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 30,
no. 45, p. 2004613, 2020.
[28] N. Zhang,
S. Huang, Z. Yuan, J. Zhu, Z. Zhao, and Z. Niu, "Direct self‐assembly of
MXene on Zn anodes for dendrite‐free aqueous zinc‐ion batteries," Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol.
60, no. 6, pp. 2861-2865, 2021.
[29] F. N. U.
Khan, M. G. Rasul, A. Sayem, and N. K. Mandal, "Design and optimization of
lithium-ion battery as an efficient energy storage device for electric
vehicles: A comprehensive review," Journal
of Energy Storage, vol. 71, p. 108033, 2023.
[30] A. G.
Olabi, Q. Abbas, P. A. Shinde, and M. A. Abdelkareem, "Rechargeable
batteries: Technological advancement, challenges, current and emerging
applications," Energy, p.
126408, 2022.
[31] J. Chen et al., "Emerging two-dimensional
nanostructured manganese-based materials for electrochemical energy storage:
recent advances, mechanisms, challenges, and perspectives," Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2022.
[32] A. Liu,
X. Liang, X. Ren, W. Guan, and T. Ma, "Recent progress in MXene-based
materials for metal-sulfur and metal-air batteries: potential high-performance
electrodes," Electrochemical Energy
Reviews, pp. 1-33, 2022.
[33] A. Iqbal,
J. Hong, T. Y. Ko, and C. M. Koo, "Improving oxidation stability of 2D
MXenes: synthesis, storage media, and conditions," Nano Convergence, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-22, 2021.
[34] J. Jiang et al., "Improving stability of
MXenes," Nano Research, vol. 15,
no. 7, pp. 6551-6567, 2022.
[35] Q. Zhong,
Y. Li, and G. Zhang, "Two-dimensional MXene-based and MXene-derived
photocatalysts: Recent developments and perspectives," Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 409,
p. 128099, 2021.
[36] X. Lu et al., "Novel light-driven and
electro-driven polyethylene glycol/two-dimensional MXene form-stable phase
change material with enhanced thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity
for thermal energy storage," Composites
Part B: Engineering, vol. 177, p. 107372, 2019.
[37] X. Zhang et al., "In situ modified
mesoporous MXene film with excellent oxidation resistance for high-performance
supercapacitor," Applied Materials
Today, vol. 27, p. 101483, 2022.
[38] Z. Chen,
Q. Shen, J. Xiong, J. Jiang, Z. Ju, and X. Zhang, "Advanced Electrode
Materials for Potassium‐Ion Hybrid Capacitors," Batteries & Supercaps, vol. 6, no. 9, p. e202300224, 2023.
[39] K.
Zukiene et al., "Wettability of
MXene and its interfacial adhesion with epoxy resin," Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 257, p. 123820, 2021.
[40] Y. Tian et al., "Flexible and
Free-Standing Ti3C2Tx MXene@Zn Paper for Dendrite-Free Aqueous Zinc Metal
Batteries and Nonaqueous Lithium Metal Batteries," ACS Nano, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 11676-11685, 2019/10/22 2019, doi:
10.1021/acsnano.9b05599.
[41] X. Hui,
X. Ge, R. Zhao, Z. Li, and L. Yin, "Interface chemistry on MXene‐based
materials for enhanced energy storage and conversion performance," Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 30,
no. 50, p. 2005190, 2020.
[42] K. Li et al., "3D MXene Architectures
for Efficient Energy Storage and Conversion," Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 30, no. 47, p. 2000842, 2020,
doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202000842.
[43] S. Zhang et al., "Ultrafine Sb Pillared
Few-Layered Ti3C2Tx MXenes for Advanced Sodium Storage," ACS Applied Energy Materials, vol. 4,
no. 9, pp. 9806-9815, 2021.
[44] R. Wang,
M. Li, K. Sun, Y. Zhang, J. Li, and W. Bao, "Element‐Doped Mxenes:
Mechanism, Synthesis, and Applications," Small, vol. 18, no. 25, p. 2201740, 2022.
[45] H.
Larijani and M. Khorshidian, "Theoretical insight into the role of
pyridinic nitrogen on the catalytic activity of boron-doped graphene towards
oxygen reduction reaction," Applied
Surface Science, vol. 492, pp. 826-842, 2019.
[46] M. Iqbal et al., "Co-existence of magnetic
phases in two-dimensional MXene," Materials
Today Chemistry, vol. 16, p. 100271, 2020.
[47] C. Lu et al., "Nitrogen‐doped Ti3C2
MXene: mechanism investigation and electrochemical analysis," Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 30,
no. 47, p. 2000852, 2020.
[48] W. Bao et al., "Porous Heteroatom-Doped
Ti3C2Tx MXene Microspheres Enable Strong Adsorption of Sodium Polysulfides for
Long-Life Room-Temperature Sodium–Sulfur Batteries," ACS Nano, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 16207-16217, 2021/10/26 2021, doi:
10.1021/acsnano.1c05193.
[49] Y. An, Y.
Tian, C. Liu, S. Xiong, J. Feng, and Y. Qian, "Rational Design of
Sulfur-Doped Three-Dimensional Ti3C2T x MXene/ZnS Heterostructure as
Multifunctional Protective Layer for Dendrite-Free Zinc-Ion Batteries," Acs Nano, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 15259-15273,
2021.
[50] X. Han et al., "Ti3C2 MXene-derived
carbon-doped TiO2 coupled with g-C3N4 as the visible-light photocatalysts for
photocatalytic H2 generation," Applied
Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 265, p. 118539, 2020.
[51] J. Tang et al., "Interlayer space
engineering of MXenes for electrochemical energy storage applications," Chemistry–A European Journal, vol. 27,
no. 6, pp. 1921-1940, 2021.
[52] S. Luan et al., "MoS 2-decorated 2D Ti 3 C
2 (MXene): a high-performance anode material for lithium-ion batteries," Ionics, vol. 26, pp. 51-59, 2020.
[53] N.
Hemanth, T. Kim, B. Kim, A. H. Jadhav, K. Lee, and N. K. Chaudhari,
"Transition metal dichalcogenide-decorated MXenes: promising hybrid
electrodes for energy storage and conversion applications," Materials Chemistry Frontiers, vol. 5,
no. 8, pp. 3298-3321, 2021.
[54] N. Xue,
X. Li, M. Zhang, L. Han, Y. Liu, and X. Tao, "Chemical-combined
ball-milling synthesis of fluorine-free porous MXene for high-performance
lithium ion batteries," ACS Applied
Energy Materials, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 10234-10241, 2020.
[55] Y. Liu et al., "Advanced
characterizations and measurements for sodium-ion batteries with NASICON-type
cathode materials," EScience, vol.
2, no. 1, pp. 10-31, 2022.
[56] Z. Huang et al., "Surface and structure
engineering of MXenes for rechargeable batteries beyond lithium," Journal of Materiomics, 2023.
[57] J. Xu et al., "Potassium-based
electrochemical energy storage devices: Development status and future
prospect," Energy Storage Materials,
vol. 34, pp. 85-106, 2021.
[58] H.-J.
Peng, J.-Q. Huang, and Q. Zhang, "A review of flexible lithium–sulfur and
analogous alkali metal–chalcogen rechargeable batteries," Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 46, no.
17, pp. 5237-5288, 2017.
[59] M. Naguib et al., "Two-Dimensional
Nanocrystals: Two-Dimensional Nanocrystals Produced by Exfoliation of Ti3AlC2
(Adv. Mater. 37/2011)," Advanced
Materials, vol. 23, no. 37, pp. 4207-4207, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201190147.
[60] B.
Anasori, M. Naguib, and G. Editors, "Two-dimensional MXenes," MRS Bulletin, vol. 48, no. 3, pp.
238-244, 2023.
[61] B. M.
Francis, J. S. Ponraj, N. L. Raveendran, R. K. Manavalan, and S. C. Dhanabalan,
"Introduction: MXene—A Novel Two-Dimensional Material: Preparation,
Properties, and Applications," in MXene-Filled
Polymer Nanocomposites: CRC Press, 2022, pp. 1-26.
[62] I.
Persson et al., "Tailoring
Structure, Composition, and Energy Storage Properties of MXenes from Selective
Etching of In-Plane, Chemically Ordered MAX Phases," Small, vol. 14, no. 17, p. 1703676, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201703676.
[63] P.
Eklund, J. Rosen, and P. O. Å. Persson, "Layered ternary Mn phases and
their 2D derivative MXene: an overview from a thin-film perspective."
[64] O. Salim,
K. Mahmoud, K. Pant, and R. Joshi, "Introduction to MXenes: synthesis and
characteristics," Materials Today
Chemistry, vol. 14, p. 100191, 2019.
[65] B.
Anasori and Y. Gogotsi, "Introduction to 2D transition metal carbides and
nitrides (MXenes)," 2D Metal
Carbides and Nitrides (MXenes) Structure, Properties and Applications, pp.
3-12, 2019.
[66] M.
Dadashi Firouzjaei, M. Karimiziarani, H. Moradkhani, M. Elliott, and B.
Anasori, "MXenes: The two-dimensional influencers," Materials Today Advances, vol. 13, p.
100202, 2022/03/01/ 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2021.100202.
[67] U.
Yorulmaz, İ. Demiroğlu, D. Çakir, O. Gülseren, and C. Sevik, "A
systematical ab-initio review of promising 2D MXene monolayers towards Li-ion
battery applications," Journal of
Physics: Energy, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 032006, 2020.
[68] L. Liao,
D. Jiang, K. Zheng, M. Zhang, and J. Liu, "Industry‐scale and
environmentally stable Ti3C2Tx MXene based film for flexible energy storage
devices," Advanced Functional
Materials, vol. 31, no. 35, p. 2103960, 2021.
[69] W. Zheng et al., "Mass loading and
self-discharge challenges for MXene-based aqueous supercapacitors," Energy Storage Materials, vol. 63, p.
103037, 2023/11/01/ 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2023.103037.
[70] K. Khan et al., "Recent advances in
MXenes: A future of nanotechnologies," Journal
of Materials Chemistry A, 2023.
[71] L. Gao,
W. Bao, A. V. Kuklin, S. Mei, H. Zhang, and H. Ågren, "Hetero‐MXenes:
theory, synthesis, and emerging applications," Advanced Materials, vol. 33, no. 10, p. 2004129, 2021.
[72] P. Hou,
X. Fu, Q. Xia, and Z. Yang, "2D Metal Carbides," Layered 2D Advanced Materials and Their Allied Applications, pp.
47-78, 2020.
[73] N.
Kubitza, C. Büchner, J. Sinclair, R. M. Snyder, and C. S. Birkel,
"Extending the Chemistry of Layered Solids and Nanosheets: Chemistry and
Structure of MAX Phases, MAB Phases and MXenes," ChemPlusChem, vol. 88, no. 8, p. e202300214, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cplu.202300214.
[74] J. Zhang et al., "Scalable manufacturing of
free‐standing, strong Ti3C2Tx MXene films with outstanding conductivity," Advanced Materials, vol. 32, no. 23, p.
2001093, 2020.
[75] S.
Abdolhosseinzadeh, X. Jiang, H. Zhang, J. Qiu, and C. J. Zhang,
"Perspectives on solution processing of two-dimensional MXenes," Materials Today, vol. 48, pp. 214-240,
2021.
[76] J. D.
Gouveia, F. Viñes, F. Illas, and J. R. Gomes, "MXenes atomic layer
stacking phase transitions and their chemical activity consequences," Physical Review Materials, vol. 4, no.
5, p. 054003, 2020.
[77] S. Jana,
S. Selvaganesan, and S. S. Sethuganesh, "Prospects of Graphene and MXene
in Flexible Electronics and Energy Storage Systems: A Review," Materials for Sustainable Energy Storage at
the Nanoscale, pp. 271-282, 2023.
[78] C. Eames
and M. S. Islam, "Ion intercalation into two-dimensional transition-metal
carbides: global screening for new high-capacity battery materials," Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol.
136, no. 46, pp. 16270-16276, 2014.
[79] M.
Naguib, V. N. Mochalin, M. W. Barsoum, and Y. Gogotsi, "25th Anniversary
Article: MXenes: A New Family of Two-Dimensional Materials," Advanced Materials, vol. 26, no. 7, pp.
992-1005, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201304138.
[80] M.
Jakubczak1a et al., "MXene-based
materials for the application in point-of-use water filters."
[81] N. Anjum,
O. A. Ekuase, V. O. Eze, and O. I. Okoli, "Ti-based MXenes for energy
storage applications: structure, properties, processing parameters and
stability," ECS Journal of Solid
State Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 093008, 2022.
[82] K.
Maleski, C. E. Ren, M.-Q. Zhao, B. Anasori, and Y. Gogotsi,
"Size-dependent physical and electrochemical properties of two-dimensional
MXene flakes," ACS applied materials
& interfaces, vol. 10, no. 29, pp. 24491-24498, 2018.
[83] S. Munir et al., "Exploring the Influence
of Critical Parameters for the Effective Synthesis of High-Quality 2D
MXene," ACS Omega, vol. 5, no.
41, pp. 26845-26854, 2020/10/20 2020, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c03970.
[84] C. E.
Shuck et al., "Effect of Ti3AlC2
MAX phase on structure and properties of resultant Ti3C2T x MXene," ACS Applied Nano Materials, vol. 2, no.
6, pp. 3368-3376, 2019.
[85] Q. Li and
Z. Qin, "Preparation Method for MXene," in MXene-Based Photocatalysts: CRC Press, 2022, pp. 5-26.
[86] C. Zhang et al., "Recent Advances in the
Synthesis and Energy Applications of 2D MXenes," ChemElectroChem, vol. 8, no. 20, pp. 3804-3826, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202100482.
[87] Y. Wei,
P. Zhang, R. A. Soomro, Q. Zhu, and B. Xu, "Advances in the Synthesis of
2D MXenes," Advanced Materials, vol.
33, no. 39, p. 2103148, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202103148.
[88] A.
Zamhuri, G. P. Lim, N. L. Ma, K. S. Tee, and C. F. Soon, "MXene in the
lens of biomedical engineering: synthesis, applications and future
outlook," Biomedical engineering
online, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1-24, 2021.
[89] T.
Amrillah, C. A. C. Abdullah, A. Hermawan, F. N. I. Sari, and V. N. Alviani,
"Towards Greener and More Sustainable Synthesis of MXenes: A Review,"
Nanomaterials, vol. 12, no. 23, p.
4280, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/12/23/4280.
[90] Y. Wang et al., "MXenes for Sulfur-Based
Batteries," Advanced Energy
Materials, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 2202860, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202202860.
[91] Z. Fu et al., "Rational design of
flexible two-dimensional MXenes with multiple functionalities," Chemical reviews, vol. 119, no. 23, pp.
11980-12031, 2019.
[92] T.
El-Raghy, M. W. Barsoum, and M. Sika, "Reaction of Al with Ti3SiC2 in the
800–1000°C temperature range," Materials
Science and Engineering: A, vol. 298, no. 1, pp. 174-178, 2001/01/31/ 2001,
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01281-8.
[93] M. W.
Barsoum, T. El‐Raghy, L. Farber, M. Amer, R. Christini, and A. Adams, "The
topotactic transformation of Ti3SiC2 into a partially ordered cubic Ti (C 0.67
Si0. 06) phase by the diffusion of si into molten cryolite," Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol.
146, no. 10, p. 3919, 1999.
[94] X. Xie,
K. Kretschmer, B. Anasori, B. Sun, G. Wang, and Y. Gogotsi, "Porous
Ti3C2Tx MXene for Ultrahigh-Rate Sodium-Ion Storage with Long Cycle Life,"
ACS Applied Nano Materials, vol. 1,
no. 2, pp. 505-511, 2018/02/23 2018, doi: 10.1021/acsanm.8b00045.
[95] M. W.
Barsoum, J. Golczewski, H. J. Seifert, and F. Aldinger, "Fabrication and
electrical and thermal properties of Ti2InC, Hf2InC and (Ti,Hf)2InC," Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol.
340, no. 1, pp. 173-179, 2002/06/26/ 2002, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(02)00107-X.
[96] Y.
Gogotsi et al., "Nanoporous
carbide-derived carbon with tunable pore size," Nature Materials, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 591-594, 2003/09/01 2003, doi:
10.1038/nmat957.
[97] E. N.
Hoffman, G. Yushin, M. W. Barsoum, and Y. Gogotsi, "Synthesis of
Carbide-Derived Carbon by Chlorination of Ti2AlC," Chemistry of Materials, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 2317-2322, 2005/05/01
2005, doi: 10.1021/cm047739i.
[98] F. Ming,
H. Liang, G. Huang, Z. Bayhan, and H. N. Alshareef, "MXenes for
Rechargeable Batteries Beyond the Lithium-Ion," Advanced Materials, vol. 33, no. 1, p. 2004039, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202004039.
[99] S. Biswas
and P. S. Alegaonkar, "MXene: Evolutions in Chemical Synthesis and Recent
Advances in Applications," Surfaces,
vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-34, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9637/5/1/1.
[100] K. Zhu et al., "Synthesis of Ti2CTx MXene
as electrode materials for symmetric supercapacitor with capable volumetric
capacitance," Journal of energy
chemistry, vol. 31, pp. 11-18, 2019.
[101] S. Zhao et al., "Li-ion uptake and
increase in interlayer spacing of Nb4C3 MXene," Energy Storage Materials, vol. 8, pp. 42-48, 2017.
[102] M. H. Tran et al., "Adding a new member to
the MXene family: synthesis, structure, and electrocatalytic activity for the
hydrogen evolution reaction of V4C3T x," ACS Applied Energy Materials, vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 3908-3914, 2018.
[103] M. Naguib et al., "Two-dimensional
transition metal carbides," ACS
nano, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1322-1331, 2012.
[104] B. Anasori et al., "Two-dimensional, ordered,
double transition metals carbides (MXenes)," ACS nano, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 9507-9516, 2015.
[105] Q. Tao et al., "Two-dimensional Mo1. 33C
MXene with divacancy ordering prepared from parent 3D laminate with in-plane
chemical ordering," Nature
communications, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 14949, 2017.
[106] J. Halim et al., "Synthesis of
two-dimensional Nb1. 33C (MXene) with randomly distributed vacancies by etching
of the quaternary solid solution (Nb2/3Sc1/3) 2AlC MAX phase," ACS Applied Nano Materials, vol. 1, no.
6, pp. 2455-2460, 2018.
[107] R.
Meshkian et al., "W‐based atomic
laminates and their 2D derivative W1. 33C MXene with vacancy ordering," Advanced Materials, vol. 30, no. 21, p.
1706409, 2018.
[108] J. Zhou et al., "A two‐dimensional
zirconium carbide by selective etching of Al3C3 from nanolaminated
Zr3Al3C5," Angewandte Chemie
International Edition, vol. 55, no. 16, pp. 5008-5013, 2016.
[109] J. Zhou et al., "Synthesis and
electrochemical properties of two-dimensional hafnium carbide," ACS nano, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 3841-3850,
2017.
[110] A.
VahidMohammadi, A. Hadjikhani, S. Shahbazmohamadi, and M. Beidaghi,
"Two-dimensional vanadium carbide (MXene) as a high-capacity cathode
material for rechargeable aluminum batteries," ACS nano, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 11135-11144, 2017.
[111] M. Naguib et al., "New two-dimensional
niobium and vanadium carbides as promising materials for Li-ion
batteries," Journal of the American
Chemical Society, vol. 135, no. 43, pp. 15966-15969, 2013.
[112] B.
Soundiraraju and B. K. George, "Two-dimensional titanium nitride (Ti2N)
MXene: synthesis, characterization, and potential application as
surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrate," ACS nano, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 8892-8900, 2017.
[113] X. Ke, M.
Pan, R. Liu, P. Wang, X. Wang, and H. Yu, "2D Molybdenum Carbide MXene
Cocatalyst: Synthesis, Modification, and Photocatalysis," Solar RRL, vol. 7, no. 22, p. 2300669,
2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.202300669.
[114] M. Naguib et al., "Two-Dimensional
Nanocrystals Produced by Exfoliation of Ti3AlC2," Advanced Materials, vol. 23, no. 37, pp. 4248-4253, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201102306.
[115] Z. Xiao et al., "MXenes and MXene-based
composites for energy conversion and storage applications," Journal of Materiomics, vol. 9, no. 6,
pp. 1067-1112, 2023/11/01/ 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat.2023.04.013.
[116] P. Huang
and W.-Q. Han, "Recent advances and perspectives of Lewis acidic etching
route: An emerging preparation strategy for MXenes," Nano-Micro Letters, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 68, 2023.
[117] S. Asad et al., "Recent Advances in
Titanium Carbide MXene (Ti3C2T x) Cathode Material for Lithium–Air
Battery," ACS Applied Energy
Materials, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 11933-11946, 2022.
[118] N.
Driscoll et al.,
"Two-Dimensional Ti3C2 MXene for High-Resolution Neural Interfaces," ACS Nano, vol. 12, no. 10, pp.
10419-10429, 2018/10/23 2018, doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b06014.
[119] Z.
Pouramini et al., "Recent
Advances in MXene-Based Nanocomposites for Wastewater Purification and Water
Treatment: A Review," Water, vol.
15, no. 7, p. 1267, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/15/7/1267.
[120] S.
Venkateshalu et al., "Recent
advances in MXenes: Beyond Ti-only systems," Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2023.
[121] Q. Zhang et al., "Synthesis of Large-Area
MXenes with High Yields through Power-Focused Delamination Utilizing Vortex
Kinetic Energy," Advanced Science, vol.
9, no. 28, p. 2202748, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202202748.
[122] R. Verma,
A. Sharma, V. Dutta, A. Chauhan, D. Pathak, and S. Ghotekar, "Recent
trends in synthesis of 2D MXene-based materials for sustainable environmental
applications," Emergent Materials, pp.
1-28, 2023.
[123] A. Feng et al., "Fabrication and thermal
stability of NH4HF2-etched Ti3C2 MXene," Ceramics International, vol. 43, 02/01 2017, doi:
10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.02.039.
[124] J. Mei, G.
A. Ayoko, C. Hu, J. M. Bell, and Z. Sun, "Two-dimensional fluorine-free
mesoporous Mo2C MXene via UV-induced selective etching of Mo2Ga2C for energy
storage," Sustainable Materials and
Technologies, vol. 25, p. e00156, 2020/09/01/ 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2020.e00156.
[125] A. Bhat,
S. Anwer, K. S. Bhat, M. I. H. Mohideen, K. Liao, and A. Qurashi,
"Prospects challenges and stability of 2D MXenes for clean energy
conversion and storage applications," npj
2D Materials and Applications, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 61, 2021.
[126] S. Bai et al., "Recent advances of MXenes
as electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction," npj 2D Materials and Applications, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 78, 2021/09/09
2021, doi: 10.1038/s41699-021-00259-4.
[127] Y. Li et al., "A general Lewis acidic
etching route for preparing MXenes with enhanced electrochemical performance in
non-aqueous electrolyte," Nature
Materials, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 894-899, 2020.
[128] M. Li et al., "Element replacement
approach by reaction with Lewis acidic molten salts to synthesize nanolaminated
MAX phases and MXenes," Journal of
the American Chemical Society, vol. 141, no. 11, pp. 4730-4737, 2019.
[129] A. Jawaid et al., "Halogen etch of Ti3AlC2
MAX phase for MXene fabrication," ACS
nano, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 2771-2777, 2021.
[130] H. Shi et al., "Ambient‐stable
two‐dimensional titanium carbide (MXene) enabled by iodine etching," Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol.
60, no. 16, pp. 8689-8693, 2021.
[131] X. Wang,
Y. Shi, J. Qiu, and Z. Wang, "Molten-salt etching synthesis of
delaminatable MXenes," Chemical
Communications, vol. 59, no. 34, pp. 5063-5066, 2023.
[132] F. Wang et al., "Advances in
molten-salt-assisted synthesis of 2D MXenes and their applications in
electrochemical energy storage and conversion," Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 470, p. 144185, 2023/08/15/
2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.144185.
[133] S. Jin, Y.
Guo, F. Wang, and A. Zhou, "The synthesis of MXenes," MRS Bulletin, vol. 48, no. 3, pp.
245-252, 2023/03/01 2023, doi: 10.1557/s43577-023-00491-x.
[134] M. Li et al., "Halogenated Ti3C2 MXenes
with electrochemically active terminals for high-performance zinc ion
batteries," ACS nano, vol. 15,
no. 1, pp. 1077-1085, 2021.
[135] M. Shen et al., "One‐pot green process to
synthesize MXene with controllable surface terminations using molten
salts," Angewandte Chemie
International Edition, vol. 60, no. 52, pp. 27013-27018, 2021.
[136] G. Ma et al., "Li-ion storage properties
of two-dimensional titanium-carbide synthesized via fast one-pot method in air
atmosphere," Nature communications, vol.
12, no. 1, p. 5085, 2021.
[137] L. Liu et al., "Exfoliation and
delamination of Ti3C2T x MXene prepared via molten salt etching route," ACS nano, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 111-118,
2021.
[138] M. P.
Bilibana, "Electrochemical properties of MXenes and applications," Advanced Sensor and Energy Materials, vol.
2, no. 4, p. 100080, 2023/12/01/ 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asems.2023.100080.
[139] L. Zhang,
W. Song, H. Liu, H. Ding, Y. Yan, and R. Chen, "Influencing Factors on
Synthesis and Properties of MXene: A Review," Processes, vol. 10, no. 9, p. 1744, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/10/9/1744.
[140] G. Manasa
and C. S. Rout, "Versatile MXenes as electrochemical sensors for heavy
metal ions and phenolic moiety-containing industrial chemicals: recent
development and prospects," Materials
Advances, 10.1039/D3MA00362K vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 83-122, 2024, doi:
10.1039/D3MA00362K.
[141] W. Sun et al., "Electrochemical etching
of Ti 2 AlC to Ti 2 CT x (MXene) in low-concentration hydrochloric acid
solution," Journal of Materials
Chemistry A, vol. 5, no. 41, pp. 21663-21668, 2017.
[142] L. Gao et al., "MXene/polymer membranes:
synthesis, properties, and emerging applications," Chemistry of Materials, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1703-1747, 2020.
[143] C. Xu et al., "Large-area high-quality
2D ultrathin Mo2C superconducting crystals," Nature materials, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1135-1141, 2015.
[144] Z. Xiao et al., "Synthesis and Properties
of MXenes," in MXenes and
MXenes-based Composites: Processing and Applications, Z. Xiao et al. Eds. Cham: Springer
International Publishing, 2020, pp. 5-93.
[145] A. Lipatov et al., "High electrical
conductivity and breakdown current density of individual monolayer Ti3C2Tx
MXene flakes," Matter, vol. 4,
no. 4, pp. 1413-1427, 2021.
[146] X. Jiang et al., "Two-dimensional MXenes:
From morphological to optical, electric, and magnetic properties and
applications," Physics Reports, vol.
848, pp. 1-58, 2020.
[147] J. Xu et al., "Recent advances in 2D
MXenes: preparation, intercalation and applications in flexible devices," Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol.
9, no. 25, pp. 14147-14171, 2021.
[148] C. Wei et al., "In Situ Growth
Engineering on 2D MXenes for Next-Generation Rechargeable Batteries," Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research,
vol. 4, no. 11, p. 2300103, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/aesr.202300103.
[149] M.
Mozafari and M. Soroush, "Surface functionalization of MXenes," Materials Advances, 10.1039/D1MA00625H
vol. 2, no. 22, pp. 7277-7307, 2021, doi: 10.1039/D1MA00625H.
[150] S.
Ganesan, K. Ramajayam, T. Kokulnathan, and A. Palaniappan, "Recent
Advances in Two-Dimensional MXene-Based Electrochemical Biosensors for Sweat
Analysis," Molecules, vol. 28,
no. 12, p. 4617, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/28/12/4617.
[151] W. Zhang
and X. Zhang, "The effect of ultrasound on synthesis and energy storage
mechanism of Ti3C2Tx MXene," Ultrasonics
Sonochemistry, vol. 89, p. 106122, 2022.
[152] J. Li, M.
Lu, W. Zheng, and W. Zhang, "Ion-intercalation architecture for robust
functionalization of two-dimensional MXenes," Energy Storage Materials, vol. 64, p. 103068, 2024/01/01/ 2024,
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2023.103068.
[153] M. Hu et al., "Selectivity for
intercalated ions in MXene toward a high-performance capacitive
electrode," Science China Materials,
vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 974-981, 2023/03/01 2023, doi:
10.1007/s40843-022-2243-2.
[154] T. Zhang et al., "Simultaneously tuning
interlayer spacing and termination of MXenes by Lewis-basic halides," Nature Communications, vol. 13, no. 1,
p. 6731, 2022.
[155] C. Li et al., "Synthesis of nickel
hydroxide/delaminated-Ti3C2 MXene nanosheets as promising anode material for
high performance lithium ion battery," Journal
of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 842, p. 155812, 2020.
[156] G. Li, L.
Tan, Y. Zhang, B. Wu, and L. Li, "Highly efficiently delaminated
single-layered MXene nanosheets with large lateral size," Langmuir, vol. 33, no. 36, pp.
9000-9006, 2017.
[157] G. Lv, J.
Wang, Z. Shi, and L. Fan, "Intercalation and delamination of
two-dimensional MXene (Ti3C2Tx) and application in sodium-ion batteries," Materials Letters, vol. 219, pp. 45-50,
2018.
[158] H. Lin, S.
Gao, C. Dai, Y. Chen, and J. Shi, "A two-dimensional biodegradable niobium
carbide (MXene) for photothermal tumor eradication in NIR-I and NIR-II
biowindows," Journal of the American
Chemical Society, vol. 139, no. 45, pp. 16235-16247, 2017.
[159] M.
Seredych, K. Maleski, T. S. Mathis, and Y. Gogotsi, "Delamination of
MXenes using bovine serum albumin," Colloids
and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 641, p.
128580, 2022.
[160] X. Chen et al., "N-butyllithium-treated
Ti3C2T x MXene with excellent pseudocapacitor performance," ACS nano, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 9449-9456,
2019.
[161] Z. Xiao et al., "Energy Related
Applications," in MXenes and
MXenes-based Composites: Processing and Applications, Z. Xiao et al. Eds. Cham: Springer
International Publishing, 2020, pp. 207-302.
[162] Y.
Dall'Agnese, M. R. Lukatskaya, K. M. Cook, P.-L. Taberna, Y. Gogotsi, and P.
Simon, "High capacitance of surface-modified 2D titanium carbide in acidic
electrolyte," Electrochemistry
Communications, vol. 48, pp. 118-122, 2014.
[163] M. Tang et al., "Surface Terminations of
MXene: Synthesis, Characterization, and Properties," Symmetry, vol. 14, no. 11, p. 2232, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/11/2232.
[164] J. Peng,
X. Chen, W.-J. Ong, X. Zhao, and N. Li, "Surface and Heterointerface
Engineering of 2D MXenes and Their Nanocomposites: Insights into Electro- and
Photocatalysis," Chem, vol. 5,
no. 1, pp. 18-50, 2019/01/10/ 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2018.08.037.
[165] B. Lu, Z.
Zhu, B. Ma, W. Wang, R. Zhu, and J. Zhang, "2D MXene nanomaterials for
versatile biomedical applications: current trends and future prospects," Small, vol. 17, no. 46, p. 2100946,
2021.
[166] S. S.
Shinde, N. K. Wagh, S.-H. Kim, and J.-H. Lee, "Li, Na, K, Mg, Zn, Al, and
Ca Anode Interface Chemistries Developed by Solid-State Electrolytes," Advanced Science, vol. 10, no. 32, p.
2304235, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202304235.
[167] K. A. U.
Madhushani, A. A. P. R. Perera, A. Kumar, and R. K. Gupta, "MXene-based
promising nanomaterials for electrochemical energy storage," Molecular Catalysis, vol. 547, p.
113284, 2023/08/01/ 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2023.113284.
[168] Q. Zhang et al., "Theoretical insights into
the favorable functionalized Ti2C-based MXenes for lithium–sulfur
batteries," ACS omega, vol. 5,
no. 45, pp. 29272-29283, 2020.
[169] M. K.
Aslam, Y. Niu, and M. Xu, "MXenes for Non-Lithium-Ion (Na, K, Ca, Mg, and
Al) Batteries and Supercapacitors," Advanced
Energy Materials, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 2000681, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202000681.
[170] T. Rasheed et al., "Environmental threatening
concern and efficient removal of pharmaceutically active compounds using
metal-organic frameworks as adsorbents," Environmental research, vol. 185, p. 109436, 2020.
[171] T. Rashid et al., "Design and feasibility
study of novel paraboloid graphite based microbial fuel cell for
bioelectrogenesis and pharmaceutical wastewater treatment," Journal of Environmental Chemical
Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 104502, 2021.
[172] Z. B.
Babar, N. Urfi, S. u. Rehman, and K. Rizwan, "Efficacy of MXene-Based
Materials in the Removal of Gases," in Handbook
of Functionalized Nanostructured MXenes: Synthetic Strategies and Applications
from Energy to Environment Sustainability: Springer, 2023, pp. 207-228.
[173] J. L. Hart et al., "Control of MXenes’
electronic properties through termination and intercalation," Nature communications, vol. 10, no. 1,
p. 522, 2019.
[174] X. Li, F.
Ran, F. Yang, J. Long, and L. Shao, "Advances in MXene Films: Synthesis,
Assembly, and Applications," Transactions
of Tianjin University, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 217-247, 2021/06/01 2021, doi:
10.1007/s12209-021-00282-y.
[175] A. S.
Zeraati, S. A. Mirkhani, P. Sun, M. Naguib, P. V. Braun, and U. Sundararaj,
"Improved synthesis of Ti 3 C 2 T x MXenes resulting in exceptional
electrical conductivity, high synthesis yield, and enhanced capacitance," Nanoscale, vol. 13, no. 6, pp.
3572-3580, 2021.
[176] X. Tang
and M. Zhou, "MXene-based electromagnetic wave response," Journal of Physics: Energy, vol. 3, no.
4, p. 042001, 2021.
[177] K.
Hantanasirisakul and Y. Gogotsi, "Electronic and optical properties of 2D
transition metal carbides and nitrides (MXenes)," Advanced materials, vol. 30, no. 52, p. 1804779, 2018.
[178] N.
García-Romeral, Á. Morales-García, F. Vines, I. d. P. Moreira, and F. Illas,
"Theoretical Analysis of Magnetic Coupling in the Ti2C Bare MXene," The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol.
127, no. 7, pp. 3706-3714, 2023.
[179] Y. Xie and
P. Kent, "Hybrid density functional study of structural and electronic
properties of functionalized Ti n+ 1 X n (X= C, N) monolayers," Physical Review B, vol. 87, no. 23, p.
235441, 2013.
[180] H. Kim, B.
Anasori, Y. Gogotsi, and H. N. Alshareef, "Thermoelectric Properties of
Two-Dimensional Molybdenum-Based MXenes," Chemistry of Materials, vol. 29, no. 15, pp. 6472-6479, 2017/08/08
2017, doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02056.
[181] K. A.
Papadopoulou, A. Chroneos, D. Parfitt, and S.-R. G. Christopoulos, "A
perspective on MXenes: Their synthesis, properties, and recent
applications," Journal of Applied
Physics, vol. 128, no. 17, 2020, doi: 10.1063/5.0021485.
[182] J. Cui, Q.
Peng, J. Zhou, and Z. Sun, "Strain-tunable electronic structures and
optical properties of semiconducting MXenes," Nanotechnology, vol. 30, no. 34, p. 345205, 2019.
[183] Y. Shao,
"MXene-Based Materials for Energy Conversion/Storage and Device
Applications: A First-Principles Study," University of Macau, 2020.
[184] H. Kim, Z.
Wang, and H. N. Alshareef, "MXetronics: Electronic and photonic
applications of MXenes," Nano
Energy, vol. 60, pp. 179-197, 2019.
[185] Y. Zhang,
Q. Lu, L. Zhang, L. Zhang, G. Shao, and P. Zhang, "Adjustable MXene-Based
Materials in Metal-Ion Batteries: Progress, Prospects, and Challenges," Small Structures, vol. n/a, no. n/a, p.
2300255, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sstr.202300255.
[186] J. Nan et al., "Nanoengineering of 2D
MXene-Based Materials for Energy Storage Applications," (in eng), Small, vol. 17, no. 9, p. e1902085, Mar
2021, doi: 10.1002/smll.201902085.
[187] Y. Feng et al., "Towards high energy
density Li–S batteries with high sulfur loading: From key issues to advanced
strategies," Energy Storage
Materials, vol. 32, pp. 320-355, 2020/11/01/ 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.06.043.
[188] O. Leonet,
Á. Doñoro, A. Fernández-Barquín, A. Kvasha, I. Urdampilleta, and J. A.
Blázquez, "Understanding of Crucial Factors for Improving the Energy
Density of Lithium-Sulfur Pouch Cells," Frontiers in Chemistry, vol. 10, p. 888750, 2022.
[189] L. Wang,
M. Zhen, and Z. Hu, "Status and prospects of electrocatalysts for
lithium-sulfur battery under lean electrolyte and high sulfur loading
conditions," Chemical Engineering
Journal, vol. 452, p. 139344, 2023.
[190] M. Jana et al., "Rational Design of
Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries," Energy & Environmental Science, vol.
13, 11/19 2019, doi: 10.1039/C9EE02049G.
[191] G. Di
Donato, T. Ates, H. Adenusi, A. Varzi, M. A. Navarra, and S. Passerini,
"Electrolyte Measures to Prevent Polysulfide Shuttle in Lithium‐Sulfur
Batteries," Batteries &
Supercaps, vol. 5, no. 7, p. e202200097, 2022.
[192] Y. Zhou et al., "Unleashing the Potential
of MXene‐Based Flexible Materials for High‐Performance Energy Storage
Devices," Advanced Science, p.
2304874, 2023.
[193] Q. Liang,
S. Wang, Y. Yao, P. Dong, and H. Song, "Transition Metal Compounds Family
for Li–S Batteries: The DFT‐Guide for Suppressing Polysulfides Shuttle," Advanced Functional Materials, p.
2300825, 2023.
[194] U.
Shahzad, H. M. Marwani, M. Saeed, A. M. Asiri, and M. M. Rahman,
"Two‐dimensional MXenes as Emerging Materials: A Comprehensive
Review," ChemistrySelect, vol.
8, no. 25, p. e202300737, 2023.
[195] E. M.
Siriwardane, I. Demiroglu, C. Sevik, F. M. Peeters, and D. Çakır,
"Assessment of Sulfur-functionalized MXenes for Li-ion Battery
applications," The Journal of
Physical Chemistry C, vol. 124, no. 39, pp. 21293-21304, 2020.
[196] T. Li et al., "A Comprehensive
Understanding of Lithium–Sulfur Battery Technology," Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 29, no. 32, p. 1901730, 2019,
doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201901730.
[197] A.
Manthiram, Y. Fu, S.-H. Chung, C. Zu, and Y.-S. Su, "Rechargeable
lithium–sulfur batteries," Chemical
reviews, vol. 114, no. 23, pp. 11751-11787, 2014.
[198] W.-G. Lim,
S. Kim, C. Jo, and J. Lee, "A Comprehensive Review of Materials with
Catalytic Effects in Li–S Batteries: Enhanced Redox Kinetics," Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol.
58, no. 52, pp. 18746-18757, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201902413.
[199] Z. Xiao,
Z. Li, X. Meng, and R. Wang, "MXene-engineered lithium–sulfur
batteries," Journal of Materials
Chemistry A, vol. 7, no. 40, pp. 22730-22743, 2019.
[200] X. Liang,
A. Garsuch, and L. F. Nazar, "Sulfur cathodes based on conductive MXene
nanosheets for high‐performance lithium–sulfur batteries," Angewandte Chemie, vol. 127, no. 13, pp.
3979-3983, 2015.
[201] X. Zhao et al., "Fabrication of layered Ti
3 C 2 with an accordion-like structure as a potential cathode material for high
performance lithium–sulfur batteries," Journal
of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 3, no. 15, pp. 7870-7876, 2015.
[202] Q. Zhao,
Q. Zhu, Y. Liu, and B. Xu, "Status and prospects of MXene‐based
lithium–sulfur batteries," Advanced
Functional Materials, vol. 31, no. 21, p. 2100457, 2021.
[203] Y. Limbu,
"First Principles Study of Properties of Functionalized MXENE (Ti2N) and
Defect onMXENE Mono-Layers," Department of Physics, 2021.
[204] D.
Johnson, B. Hunter, J. Christie, C. King, E. Kelley, and A. Djire, "Ti2N
nitride MXene evokes the Mars-van Krevelen mechanism to achieve high
selectivity for nitrogen reduction reaction," Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 657, 2022/01/13 2022, doi:
10.1038/s41598-021-04640-7.
[205] R. Podila,
N. Sapkota, S. Chiluwal, P. Parajuli, and A. Rowland, "Insights into the
pseudocapacitive behavior of sulfurized polymer electrodes for Li-S
batteries," Authorea Preprints, 2022.
[206] M. Pandey,
K. Deshmukh, and S. K. Pasha, "MXene-based materials for lithium–sulfur
and multivalent rechargeable batteries," in Mxenes and their Composites: Elsevier, 2022, pp. 343-369.
[207] H. Lin,
D.-D. Yang, N. Lou, S.-G. Zhu, and H.-Z. Li, "Functionalized titanium
nitride-based MXenes as promising host materials for lithium-sulfur batteries:
A first principles study," Ceramics
International, vol. 45, no. 2, Part A, pp. 1588-1594, 2019/02/01/ 2019,
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.033.
[208] Y. Dong et al., "All-MXene-based
integrated electrode constructed by Ti3C2 nanoribbon framework host and
nanosheet interlayer for high-energy-density Li–S batteries," Acs Nano, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 2381-2388,
2018.
[209] N. Iqbal et al., "Synergistically
engineered 2D MXenes for metal-ion/Li–S batteries: Progress and outlook," Materials Today Advances, vol. 16, p.
100303, 12/01 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.mtadv.2022.100303.
[210] W. Bao et al., "Confined sulfur in 3 D
MXene/reduced graphene oxide hybrid nanosheets for lithium–sulfur
battery," Chemistry–A European
Journal, vol. 23, no. 51, pp. 12613-12619, 2017.
[211] X. Hong,
R. Wang, Y. Liu, J. Fu, J. Liang, and S. Dou, "Recent advances in chemical
adsorption and catalytic conversion materials for Li–S batteries," Journal of Energy Chemistry, vol. 42,
pp. 144-168, 2020/03/01/ 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2019.07.001.
[212] R. Fang,
K. Chen, L. Yin, Z. Sun, F. Li, and H.-M. Cheng, "The Regulating Role of
Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene in Lithium-Ion and Lithium–Sulfur
Batteries," Advanced Materials, vol.
31, no. 9, p. 1800863, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201800863.
[213] H. Wang et al., "Enhanced kinetics and
efficient activation of sulfur by ultrathin MXene coating S-CNTs porous sphere
for highly stable and fast charging lithium-sulfur batteries," Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 420,
p. 129693, 2021.
[214] W. Zheng,
P. Zhang, J. Chen, W. B. Tian, Y. M. Zhang, and Z. M. Sun, "In situ
synthesis of CNTs@Ti3C2 hybrid structures by microwave irradiation for
high-performance anodes in lithium ion batteries," Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 10.1039/C7TA10394H vol. 6, no. 8,
pp. 3543-3551, 2018, doi: 10.1039/C7TA10394H.
[215] X. Liang,
Y. Rangom, C. Y. Kwok, Q. Pang, and L. F. Nazar, "Interwoven MXene
Nanosheet/Carbon-Nanotube Composites as Li–S Cathode Hosts," Advanced Materials, vol. 29, no. 3, p.
1603040, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201603040.
[216] L.-P. Lv,
C.-F. Guo, W. Sun, and Y. Wang, "Strong Surface-Bound Sulfur in Carbon
Nanotube Bridged Hierarchical Mo2C-Based MXene Nanosheets for Lithium–Sulfur
Batteries," Small, vol. 15, no.
3, p. 1804338, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201804338.
[217] Q. Zhao,
Q. Zhu, Y. Liu, and B. Xu, "Status and Prospects of MXene-Based
Lithium–Sulfur Batteries," Advanced
Functional Materials, vol. 31, no. 21, p. 2100457, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202100457.
[218] J. Song et al., "Rational design of
free-standing 3D porous MXene/rGO hybrid aerogels as polysulfide reservoirs for
high-energy lithium–sulfur batteries," Journal
of Materials Chemistry A, 10.1039/C9TA00212J vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 6507-6513,
2019, doi: 10.1039/C9TA00212J.
[219] W. Bao et al., "Confined Sulfur in 3 D
MXene/Reduced Graphene Oxide Hybrid Nanosheets for Lithium–Sulfur
Battery," Chemistry – A European
Journal, vol. 23, no. 51, pp. 12613-12619, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201702387.
[220] Q. Yun et al., "Hybridization of 2D
nanomaterials with 3D graphene architectures for electrochemical energy storage
and conversion," Advanced Functional
Materials, vol. 32, no. 42, p. 2202319, 2022.
[221] Z. Wang,
N. Zhang, M. Yu, J. Liu, S. Wang, and J. Qiu, "Boosting redox activity on
MXene-induced multifunctional collaborative interface in high Li2S loading
cathode for high-energy Li-S and metallic Li-free rechargeable batteries,"
Journal of Energy Chemistry, vol. 37,
pp. 183-191, 2019/10/01/ 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2019.03.012.
[222] S.
Iravani, N. Rabiee, and P. Makvandi, "Advancements in MXene-based
composites for electronic skins," Journal
of Materials Chemistry B, 10.1039/D3TB02247A vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 895-915,
2024, doi: 10.1039/D3TB02247A.
[223] S. Yi et al., "Recent advances in
MXene-based nanocomposites for supercapacitors," (in eng), Nanotechnology, vol. 34, no. 43, Aug 14
2023, doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/ace8a0.
[224] L. Chen,
X. Li, and Y. Xu, "Recent advances of polar transition-metal sulfides host
materials for advanced lithium–sulfur batteries," Functional Materials Letters, vol. 11, no. 06, p. 1840010, 2018,
doi: 10.1142/s1793604718400106.
[225] C. He, Z.
Qi, and W. Zhang, "Design of transition metal carbonitrides (MCNs) as
promising anchoring and high catalytic performance materials for lithium-sulfur
batteries," Journal of Alloys and
Compounds, vol. 934, p. 167786, 2023.
[226] H. Liu, X.
Xing, Y. Tan, and H. Dong, "Two-dimensional transition metal carbides and
nitrides (MXenes) based biosensing and molecular imaging," Nanophotonics, vol. 11, no. 22, pp.
4977-4993, 2022, doi: doi:10.1515/nanoph-2022-0550.
[227] K. Sobolev et al., "Iron Oxide
Nanoparticle-Assisted Delamination of Ti3C2Tx MXenes: A New Approach to Produce
Magnetic MXene-Based Composites," Nanomaterials,
vol. 14, no. 1, p. 97, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/14/1/97.
[228] G. S. Gund et al., "MXene/polymer hybrid
materials for flexible AC-filtering electrochemical capacitors," Joule, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 164-176, 2019.
[229] Z. Zhang,
S. Yang, P. Zhang, J. Zhang, G. Chen, and X. Feng, "Mechanically strong
MXene/Kevlar nanofiber composite membranes as high-performance nanofluidic
osmotic power generators," Nature
communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 2920, 2019.
[230] S. F. Ng,
M. Y. L. Lau, and W. J. Ong, "Lithium–sulfur battery cathode design:
tailoring metal‐based nanostructures for robust polysulfide adsorption and
catalytic conversion," Advanced
Materials, vol. 33, no. 50, p. 2008654, 2021.
[231] X. Wang et al., "A robust sulfur host with
dual lithium polysulfide immobilization mechanism for long cycle life and high
capacity Li-S batteries," Energy
Storage Materials, vol. 16, pp. 344-353, 2019.
[232] D. Guo et al., "MXene based
self-assembled cathode and antifouling separator for high-rate and
dendrite-inhibited Li–S battery," Nano
Energy, vol. 61, pp. 478-485, 2019.
[233] L. Gao et al., "MXene/Polymer Membranes:
Synthesis, Properties and Emerging Applications," Chemistry of Materials, vol. XXXX, 02/10 2020, doi:
10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b04408.
[234] D. Fang et al., "Spider-web-inspired
nanocomposite-modified separator: structural and chemical cooperativity
inhibiting the shuttle effect in Li–S batteries," ACS nano, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1563-1573, 2019.
[235] L. Kong et al., "Porphyrin‐derived
graphene‐based nanosheets enabling strong polysulfide chemisorption and rapid
kinetics in lithium–sulfur batteries," Advanced
Energy Materials, vol. 8, no. 20, p. 1800849, 2018.
[236] L. Yin, G.
Xu, P. Nie, H. Dou, and X. Zhang, "MXene debris modified eggshell membrane
as separator for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries," Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 352,
pp. 695-703, 2018/11/15/ 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.07.063.
[237] X. Wang et al., "3D Ti3C2Tx aerogels with
enhanced surface area for high performance supercapacitors," Nanoscale, 10.1039/C8NR06014B vol. 10,
no. 44, pp. 20828-20835, 2018, doi: 10.1039/C8NR06014B.
[238] Q. Meng et al., "3D Ti3C2Tx
aerogel-modified separators for high-performance Li–S batteries," Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol.
816, p. 153155, 2020/03/05/ 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153155.
[239] J. Li, Q.
Jin, F. Yin, C. Zhu, X. Zhang, and Z. Zhang, "Effect of Ti3C2Tx–PEDOT:PSS
modified-separators on the electrochemical performance of Li–S batteries,"
RSC Advances, 10.1039/D0RA06380K vol.
10, no. 66, pp. 40276-40283, 2020, doi: 10.1039/D0RA06380K.
[240] N. Li, Y.
Xie, S. Peng, X. Xiong, and K. Han, "Ultra-lightweight Ti3C2Tx MXene
modified separator for Li–S batteries: thickness regulation enabled polysulfide
inhibition and lithium ion transportation," Journal of Energy Chemistry, vol. 42, pp. 116-125, 2020.
[241] U. Noor et al., "Synthesis and
applications of MXene-based composites: A review," Nanotechnology, 2023.
[242] N. Li, W.
Cao, Y. Liu, H. Ye, and K. Han, "Impeding polysulfide shuttling with a
three-dimensional conductive carbon nanotubes/MXene framework modified
separator for highly efficient lithium-sulfur batteries," Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and
Engineering Aspects, vol. 573, pp. 128-136, 2019.
[243] L. Jiao et al., "Capture and catalytic
conversion of polysulfides by in situ built TiO2‐MXene heterostructures for
lithium–sulfur batteries," Advanced
Energy Materials, vol. 9, no. 19, p. 1900219, 2019.
[244] R. Yi et al., "A Ti3C2Tx-Based Composite
as Separator Coating for Stable Li-S Batteries," Nanomaterials, vol. 12, no. 21, p. 3770, 2022. [Online]. Available:
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/12/21/3770.
[245] M. S. Kiai et al., "Ti(3)C(2)T(x)
nanosheet@Cu/Fe-MOF separators for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries:
an experimental and density functional theory study," (in eng), Dalton Trans, Dec 1 2023, doi:
10.1039/d3dt03134a.
[246] S.
Munawar, A. F. Zahoor, M. Irfan, S. Javed, and A. u. Haq, "Design and
Applications of MXene-Based Li–S Batteries," in Handbook of Functionalized Nanostructured MXenes: Synthetic Strategies
and Applications from Energy to Environment Sustainability: Springer, 2023,
pp. 137-154.
[247] B. Li, D.
Zhang, Y. Liu, Y. Yu, S. Li, and S. Yang, "Flexible Ti3C2 MXene-lithium
film with lamellar structure for ultrastable metallic lithium anodes," Nano energy, vol. 39, pp. 654-661, 2017.
[248] W. Li et al., "Layered MXene Protected
Lithium Metal Anode as an Efficient Polysulfide Blocker for Lithium-Sulfur
Batteries," Batteries &
Supercaps, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 892-899, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.202000062.
[249] B. Sun et al., "Redox-Active
Metaphosphate-Like Terminals Enable High-Capacity MXene Anodes for Ultrafast
Na-Ion Storage," Advanced Materials,
vol. 34, no. 15, p. 2108682, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202108682.
[250] J. Wang et al., "MXenes as a versatile
platform for reactive surface modification and superior sodium-ion
storages," Exploration, vol. 1,
no. 2, p. 20210024, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/EXP.20210024.
[251] M. K.
Aslam, T. S. AlGarni, M. S. Javed, S. S. A. Shah, S. Hussain, and M. Xu,
"2D MXene materials for sodium ion batteries: a review on energy
storage," Journal of Energy Storage,
vol. 37, p. 102478, 2021.
[252] P. Ma, D.
Fang, Y. Liu, Y. Shang, Y. Shi, and H. Y. Yang, "MXene-Based Materials for
Electrochemical Sodium-Ion Storage," Advanced
Science, vol. 8, no. 11, p. 2003185, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202003185.
[253] Z. Yuan et al., "Composites of NiSe2@C
hollow nanospheres wrapped with Ti3C2Tx MXene for synergistic enhanced sodium
storage," Chemical Engineering
Journal, vol. 429, p. 132394, 2022/02/01/ 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.132394.
[254] Y. Xia et al., "Tailoring Nitrogen
Terminals on MXene Enables Fast Charging and Stable Cycling Na-Ion Batteries at
Low Temperature," Nano-Micro
Letters, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 143, 2022/07/09 2022, doi:
10.1007/s40820-022-00885-7.
[255] V. Shukla,
N. K. Jena, S. R. Naqvi, W. Luo, and R. Ahuja, "Modelling high-performing
batteries with Mxenes: The case of S-functionalized two-dimensional nitride
Mxene electrode," Nano Energy, vol.
58, pp. 877-885, 2019/04/01/ 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.007.
[256] Q. Meng et al., "The S-functionalized
Ti3C2 Mxene as a high capacity electrode material for Na-ion batteries: a DFT
study," Nanoscale, 10.1039/C7NR07649E
vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 3385-3392, 2018, doi: 10.1039/C7NR07649E.
[257] S. Sun, Z.
Xie, Y. Yan, and S. Wu, "Hybrid energy storage mechanisms for
sulfur-decorated Ti3C2 MXene anode material for high-rate and long-life
sodium-ion batteries," Chemical
Engineering Journal, vol. 366, pp. 460-467, 2019/06/15/ 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.185.
[258] J. Luo et al., "Tunable pseudocapacitance
storage of MXene by cation pillaring for high performance sodium-ion
capacitors," Journal of Materials
Chemistry A, 10.1039/C8TA02068J vol. 6, no. 17, pp. 7794-7806, 2018, doi:
10.1039/C8TA02068J.
[259] D. Zou et al., "Insights into the storage
mechanism of novel mesoporous hollow TiO2-x/C nanofibers as a high-performance
anode material for sodium-ion batteries," Carbon, vol. 194, pp. 248-256, 2022/07/01/ 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2022.04.010.
[260] V. Natu,
M. Clites, E. Pomerantseva, and M. W. Barsoum, "Mesoporous MXene powders
synthesized by acid induced crumpling and their use as Na-ion battery
anodes," Materials Research Letters,
vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 230-235, 2018/04/03 2018, doi:
10.1080/21663831.2018.1434249.
[261] Y. Zhang et al., "Recent advances and
promise of MXene-based composites as electrode materials for sodium-ion and
potassium-ion batteries," Dalton
Transactions, 10.1039/D3DT03176D 2024, doi: 10.1039/D3DT03176D.
[262] Z. Wang et al., "Free-standing
Na2C6O6/MXene composite paper for high-performance organic sodium-ion
batteries," Nano Research, vol.
16, no. 1, pp. 458-465, 2023/01/01 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12274-022-4696-5.
[263] S. Zhang et al., "Novel Synthesis of Red
Phosphorus Nanodot/Ti3C2T x MXenes from Low-Cost Ti3SiC2 MAX Phases for
Superior Lithium-and Sodium-Ion Batteries," ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 11, no. 45, pp.
42086-42093, 2019.
[264] Y. Zhang et al., "Recent advances and
promise of MXene-based composites as electrode materials for sodium-ion and
potassium-ion batteries," (in eng), Dalton
Trans, Nov 29 2023, doi: 10.1039/d3dt03176d.
[265] H.-Q. Wang et al., "Rational construction of
densely packed Si/MXene composite microspheres enables favorable sodium
storage," Rare Metals, vol. 41,
no. 5, pp. 1626-1636, 2022.
[266] K. Fan, C.
Wei, and J. Feng, "Recent Progress of MXene-Based Materials as Anodes in
Sodium-Ion Batteries," Journal of
Electronic Materials, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 847-863, 2023/02/01 2023, doi:
10.1007/s11664-022-10142-7.
[267] M. S.
Ashiq et al., "Diverse
Applications of MXene Composites for Electrochemical Energy Storage," in Handbook of Functionalized Nanostructured
MXenes: Synthetic Strategies and Applications from Energy to Environment
Sustainability: Springer, 2023, pp. 173-190.
[268] M.
Zarrabeitia et al., "Could
potassium-ion batteries become a competitive technology?," 2023.
[269] J. Li, C.
Guo, and C. M. Li, "Recent Advances of Two‐Dimensional (2 D) MXenes and
Phosphorene for High‐Performance Rechargeable Batteries," ChemSusChem, vol. 13, no. 6, pp.
1047-1070, 2020.
[270] L. Qin et al., "Capillary encapsulation
of metallic potassium in aligned carbon nanotubes for use as stable potassium
metal anodes," Advanced Energy
Materials, vol. 9, no. 29, p. 1901427, 2019.
[271] M.
Khazaei, A. Ranjbar, M. Arai, T. Sasaki, and S. Yunoki, "Electronic
properties and applications of MXenes: a theoretical review," Journal of Materials Chemistry C, vol.
5, no. 10, pp. 2488-2503, 2017.
[272] M. Naguib et al., "Electrochemical
performance of MXenes as K-ion battery anodes," Chemical Communications, vol. 53, no. 51, pp. 6883-6886, 2017.
[273] P. Zhang,
Y. Peng, Q. Zhu, R. A. Soomro, N. Sun, and B. Xu, "3D Foam‐Based MXene
Architectures: Structural and Electrolytic Engineering for Advanced
Potassium‐Ion Storage," Energy &
Environmental Materials, 2022.
[274] X. Tang et al., "MXene-Based Dendrite-Free
Potassium Metal Batteries," Advanced
Materials, vol. 32, no. 4, p. 1906739, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201906739.
[275] Y. Fang et al., "MXene-derived TiO
2/reduced graphene oxide composite with an enhanced capacitive capacity for
Li-ion and K-ion batteries," Journal
of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 5363-5372, 2019.
[276] Y. Tian,
Y. An, S. Xiong, J. Feng, and Y. Qian, "A general method for constructing
robust, flexible and freestanding MXene@ metal anodes for high-performance
potassium-ion batteries," Journal of
materials chemistry A, vol. 7, no. 16, pp. 9716-9725, 2019.
[277] J. R.
Ansari, C. A. Sunilbhai, and K. K. Sadasivuni, "MXenes and their
composites for energy storage and conversion," Mxenes and their Composites, pp. 201-240, 2022.
[278] D. X.
Song, Y. Z. Du, W. G. Ma, and X. Zhang, "High rate and capacity
performances of functionalized MXene/graphene heterostructure anodes for
magnesium‐ion batteries," International
Journal of Energy Research, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 3421-3429, 2021.
[279] H. Assad,
I. Fatma, and A. Kumar, "Recent Advancement in Zn-Ion Batteries," in Handbook of Energy Materials, R. Gupta
Ed. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022, pp. 1-27.
[280] X. Zeng,
J. Hao, Z. Wang, J. Mao, and Z. Guo, "Recent progress and perspectives on
aqueous Zn-based rechargeable batteries with mild aqueous electrolytes," Energy Storage Materials, vol. 20, pp.
410-437, 2019/07/01/ 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.04.022.
[281] Y. Wu and
Y. Yu, "2D material as anode for sodium ion batteries: Recent progress and
perspectives," Energy Storage
Materials, vol. 16, pp. 323-343, 2019/01/01/ 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2018.05.026.
[282] M. Shi, B.
Wang, C. Chen, J. Lang, C. Yan, and X. Yan, "3D high-density MXene@ MnO 2
microflowers for advanced aqueous zinc-ion batteries," Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol.
8, no. 46, pp. 24635-24644, 2020.
[283] D.
Selvakumaran, A. Pan, S. Liang, and G. Cao, "A review on recent
developments and challenges of cathode materials for rechargeable aqueous
Zn-ion batteries," Journal of
Materials Chemistry A, vol. 7, no. 31, pp. 18209-18236, 2019.
[284] Y. Liu et al., "α-MnO2 nanofibers/carbon
nanotubes hierarchically assembled microspheres: Approaching practical
applications of high-performance aqueous Zn-ion batteries," Journal of Power Sources, vol. 443, p.
227244, 2019.
[285] S. Luo et al., "Nanoscale parallel
circuitry based on interpenetrating conductive assembly for flexible and
high‐power zinc ion battery," Advanced
Functional Materials, vol. 29, no. 28, p. 1901336, 2019.
[286] M. Shi et al., "3D assembly of
MXene-stabilized spinel ZnMn2O4 for highly durable aqueous zinc-ion
batteries," Chemical Engineering
Journal, vol. 399, p. 125627, 2020.
[287] X. Li et al., "Vertically Aligned Sn4+
Preintercalated Ti2CTX MXene Sphere with Enhanced Zn Ion Transportation and
Superior Cycle Lifespan," Advanced
Energy Materials, vol. 10, no. 35, p. 2001394, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202001394.
[288] P. Liu, W.
Liu, and K. Liu, "Rational modulation of emerging MXene materials for
zinc‐ion storage," Carbon Energy, vol.
4, no. 1, pp. 60-76, 2022.
[289] P. Canepa et al., "Odyssey of multivalent
cathode materials: open questions and future challenges," Chemical reviews, vol. 117, no. 5, pp.
4287-4341, 2017.
[290] S. Chen et al., "Emerging Intercalation
Cathode Materials for Multivalent Metal‐Ion Batteries: Status and
Challenges," Small Structures, vol.
2, no. 11, p. 2100082, 2021.
[291] M. Naguib,
V. N. Mochalin, M. W. Barsoum, and Y. Gogotsi, "25th anniversary article:
MXenes: a new family of two‐dimensional materials," Advanced materials, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 992-1005, 2014.
[292] D. Aurbach et al., "Prototype systems for
rechargeable magnesium batteries," Nature,
vol. 407, no. 6805, pp. 724-727, 2000.
[293] M. S.
Whittingham, C. Siu, and J. Ding, "Can Multielectron Intercalation
Reactions Be the Basis of Next Generation Batteries?," Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 51,
no. 2, pp. 258-264, 2018/02/20 2018, doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00527.
[294] Y.-s. Guo,
F. Zhang, J. Yang, F.-f. Wang, Y. NuLi, and S.-i. Hirano, "Boron-based
electrolyte solutions with wide electrochemical windows for rechargeable
magnesium batteries," Energy &
Environmental Science, 10.1039/C2EE22509C vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 9100-9106,
2012, doi: 10.1039/C2EE22509C.
[295] Y. Xie et al., "Role of Surface Structure
on Li-Ion Energy Storage Capacity of Two-Dimensional Transition-Metal
Carbides," Journal of the American
Chemical Society, vol. 136, no. 17, pp. 6385-6394, 2014/04/30 2014, doi:
10.1021/ja501520b.
[296] M. Xu et al., "Opening Magnesium Storage
Capability of Two-Dimensional MXene by Intercalation of Cationic
Surfactant," ACS Nano, vol. 12,
no. 4, pp. 3733-3740, 2018/04/24 2018, doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b00959.
[297] M. Xu, N.
Bai, H.-X. Li, C. Hu, J. Qi, and X.-B. Yan, "Synthesis of MXene-supported
layered MoS2 with enhanced electrochemical performance for Mg batteries," Chinese Chemical Letters, vol. 29, no.
8, pp. 1313-1316, 2018/08/01/ 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2018.04.023.
[298] J. Zhu et al., "VS4 anchored on Ti3C2
MXene as a high-performance cathode material for magnesium ion battery," Journal of Power Sources, vol. 518, p.
230731, 2022.
[299] J. Zheng,
S. Ju, L. Yao, G. Xia, and X. Yu, "Construction of solid solution sulfide
embedded in MXene@N-doped carbon dual protection matrix for advanced aluminum
ion batteries," Journal of Power
Sources, vol. 511, p. 230450, 2021/11/01/ 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230450.
[300] J. Li et al., "Nb2CTx MXene Cathode for
High-Capacity Rechargeable Aluminum Batteries with Prolonged Cycle
Lifetime," ACS Applied Materials
& Interfaces, vol. 14, no. 40, pp. 45254-45262, 2022/10/12 2022, doi:
10.1021/acsami.2c09765.
[301] L. Wang et al., "Engineering of
lithium-metal anodes towards a safe and stable battery," Energy Storage Materials, vol. 14, pp.
22-48, 2018/09/01/ 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2018.02.014.
[302] Z. A.
Ghazi et al., "Key Aspects of
Lithium Metal Anodes for Lithium Metal Batteries," Small, vol. 15, no. 32, p. 1900687, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201900687.
[303] M.
Greaves, S. Barg, and M. A. Bissett, "MXene‐based anodes for metal‐ion
batteries," Batteries &
Supercaps, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 214-235, 2020.
[304] D. Zhang,
S. Wang, B. Li, Y. Gong, and S. Yang, "Horizontal Growth of Lithium on
Parallelly Aligned MXene Layers towards Dendrite-Free Metallic Lithium
Anodes," Advanced Materials, vol.
31, no. 33, p. 1901820, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201901820.
[305] Z. Cao et al., "Perpendicular MXene
Arrays with Periodic Interspaces toward Dendrite-Free Lithium Metal Anodes with
High-Rate Capabilities," Advanced
Functional Materials, vol. 30, no. 5, p. 1908075, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201908075.
[306] X. Zhang,
R. Lv, A. Wang, W. Guo, X. Liu, and J. Luo, "MXene Aerogel Scaffolds for
High-Rate Lithium Metal Anodes," Angewandte
Chemie International Edition, vol. 57, no. 46, pp. 15028-15033, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201808714.
[307] H. Shi, C.
J. Zhang, P. Lu, Y. Dong, P. Wen, and Z.-S. Wu, "Conducting and
Lithiophilic MXene/Graphene Framework for High-Capacity, Dendrite-Free
Lithium–Metal Anodes," ACS Nano, vol.
13, no. 12, pp. 14308-14318, 2019/12/24 2019, doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b07710.
[308] X. Chen,
M. Shang, and J. Niu, "Inter-layer-calated Thin Li Metal Electrode with
Improved Battery Capacity Retention and Dendrite Suppression," Nano Letters, vol. 20, no. 4, pp.
2639-2646, 2020/04/08 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00201.
[309] J. W.
Kang, J. H. Choi, J.-K. Lee, and Y. C. Kang, "Optimized lithium deposition
on Ag nanoparticles-embedded TiO2 microspheres: a facile spray pyrolysis
approach for enhanced lithium metal anode," Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 10.1039/D3TA07829A vol. 12, no.
13, pp. 7670-7679, 2024, doi: 10.1039/D3TA07829A.
[310] C. Wei et al., "Isotropic Li nucleation
and growth achieved by an amorphous liquid metal nucleation seed on MXene
framework for dendrite-free Li metal anode," Energy Storage Materials, vol. 26, pp. 223-233, 2020/04/01/ 2020,
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.01.005.
[311] J. Luo et al.,
"Pillared MXene with Ultralarge Interlayer Spacing as a Stable Matrix for
High Performance Sodium Metal Anodes," Advanced
Functional Materials, vol. 29, no. 3, p. 1805946, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201805946.
Tel: +82-10-3775-9289
Comments
Post a Comment